Review

  • Naw, this isn't intellect
    This isn't introspect
    This is when your rope only has a couple inches left
    This is when your hopes only have a couple minutes left
    No matter how dope, your homies will never get respect 
    An' everyday's like I'm tryin' to wage a bigger threat
    Get heavy play just to try to stage a bigger set
    My steady ways mean I'll never feel the trigger sweat
    Yeah, I got plenty of rage - you haven't figured yet?
    I stomp friends like the bottom of a cigarette
    'Fore they do the same to me - it's such a sick effect
    To be alone is a zone that I fit in best
    Yes, I leave my problems at home where they can get addressed
    And why the fuck do they care about how I'm gettin' dressed?
    I - am - not every other girl that you kids impress
    I'm more focused on the world than getting bigger breasts
    I'm about to snap 'em back and hit you in the neck
    So feel my feelin' 'fore you feelin' like you paralyzed
    I be writin' the realest - you peerin' into Sarah's eyes
    And every second of this record leaves me terrified
    That my optimism lost its rhythm when I dared to fly
    I am me, that's regardless of these starin' eyes
    Can't impact judgement when your subject has been sterilized
    Any questions - I'll be happy just to clarify
    I just want the chance to answer - hope I've clarified

    -Lady Essence

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    Um, damn...

    As you guys might've garnered by now, rap tends to be one of my deep passions. Given that it tends to also receive some of the greatest criticism for both being both still a very young genre (it's only 50 years old, at oldest; and remember the reaction when rock first hit the scene? Okay, not literally remember...) and for its popular genre to happen to be...well, fascinating and yet terrifyingly problematic.

    So, whenever I find a really great rap song, I try to share it as much as I can. Most recently, I reviewed Kanye's All of the Lights. I've done lists of some of my favorite story-telling songs. Et cetera.

    What's nice about Lady Essence is that she's an underground artist so I feel like I'm encouraging the continual blooming of hip hop here; oh, that's the other thing I like - she clearly listens to rap (some underground emcees - those generally who're not involved in the underground culture - clearly just picked up learning rap because of the popular stuff they've seen and, thus, tend to only focus on rapping without the cultural history of producing beats, deliverance form, and themes), so she's keeping rap in the vein of the hip hop culture. She's part of a three-to-four person crew called In the Attic. Personally, of the other two I've heard, I'm not nearly impressed as I am with her.

    On top of having an insane and utterly on point flow, she tends to have fairly intriguing topics. Plus, while not being heavy on the wordplay, her rhyme is insane, to the point that I'm just severely impressed every time she's able to articulate such concrete thoughts while having some insanely complex things going on in her rhyme. I mean, there's nothing that's carried out for all too long but there's barely a line where she's not handling two rhyme schemes at once in the above verse, not to mention that most of her rhymes tend to by multisyllabic.

    Plus, "And every second of this record leaves me terrified/That my optimism lost its rhythm when I dared to fly"?? Perfect beautiful articulation of not only how it feels when you're first transferring your written raps to actual performance (it really is quite daunting; there's a reason why most rap listeners tend to also pair as actual rappers, even if only for leisure) but also any kind of self-doubt when you try to be ambitious.

    "[M]y optimism lost its rhythm when I dared to fly." Gah, love it.

    An actual studio version of this song is on In the Attic's first mixtape, which you can download for free here: http://www.divshare.com/download/12457777-ab0 (don't worry, they released it for free).

    Also, the link to Lady Essence at ReverbNation and her Facebook page, respectively: http://www.reverbnation.com/essencehiphop and http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lady-Essence/101023706628841. The ReverbNation page has a bunch of tracks not on the crew album as well as some which don't appear on her Youtube page. If you want the Youtube URL, just follow either Youtube video here - they're both from her channel.

    Also, if you're interested in an interview with her (which I think is pretty illuminating about her as a person): http://usmfreepress.org/2010/12/lady-essence/.

  • If you haven't heard "All of the Lights" by Kanye yet, I highly suggest listening to it. Someone in the comments said (I know, I shouldn't use YouTube as my barometer for judging society at large) that, while the music was great, the song wasn't saying anything of importance.

    Well, I haven't reviewed any music in a long while (and, yes, the Archaic Word of the Day will come...soon), so, I may as well respond.

    First off, Kanye easily (okay, probably not easily) accomplishes what I'd want to do with rap if I was any ways along the lines of competency when it comes to producing and sampling.

    Essentially, you have the traditional form of beat production which is generally lo-fi samples that stress simplicity. Sure, you also have G-funk but it's generally readily evident that some form of repetition (given that it is a sample being repeated) is at work in the beat.

    I would love to really go beyond that. Don't just sample, say, horns or piano but actually have it do something as well. Have it shift and sound live and elaborate while still encompassed by the cadence.

    All of the lights is one example where Kanye does this. Rich horns, intermingled with piano. Yet it doesn't just stop there. At one point, the cadence drops out as you just get this fan-fair of horns. At another point, the piano gets its spotlight while a hook is sung over them. "All of the Lights" isn't the utmost best example of this type of dynamic sampling but it's a sufficient one. And it sounds gorgeous.

    And the very next thing I love about this track is once again in the production. Loud and defiant, the beat alone (not including the fact it's backed by a great refrain sung by Rhianna) sounds joyous really. Add in the deliciously scattered drums that back most of the song and it really just sounds completely energetic.

    And, given the refrain, nothing seems to contradict this: "Turn up the lights in here baby/Extra bright, I want y'all to see this/Turn up the lights in here, baby/You know what I need, want you to see everything, want you to see all of the lights," Rhianna starts off, sounding perfectly fine like a normal pop song. It's uproarious and sounds utterly (simplistically) hedonistic. Rhianna goes on to also mention, "Fast cars, shooting stars, all of the lights, all of the lights," sounding off traditional bravado that we've heard from rap time and time again. But, in the next line of the refrain, she rattles off, "Until they see exactly where we are." Not really menacingly or forebodingly but almost matter-of-factly. What else would you expect with the spotlight/limelight? You want to be watched because you wanted the attention to begin with. In the next lines, delivered in the same vein as the last, she tells us, "If you want, you can get it for the rest of your life," amid harmonizing vocals that continue to build up the soaring refrain. Rather than offer anything new with the last line, she just repeats the fact.

    Enter a Kanye that delivers his next two couplets with such perfect building franticness to highlight the utter genius of them that I'm willing to forgive the use of the n-word and appreciate the way the childlike naïveté in his last line (almost refusing to believe it possible that people - or particular people - can die) highlights the point even better: "Something wrong/I hold my head/MJ gone/Our nigga dead!"

    Ignoring the many times that Kanye has referenced/used Michael in his work in the past, it perfectly captures 1. the iconic stature of MJ as a figure and, in some cases, a symbol and what that might mean to people but 2. it also gets at how close to home that death really is. For Kanye, he would've grown up with Michael.  Death of an artist who deteriorated just like Kanye often seems to, death of his childhood, death of memories of the very first notions of black artists becoming major (lasting) pop icons during the time of MJ's rise to popularity, to list a few things I've read and thought of off the top of my head. Who's to say whether Kanye meant any of them but it's easy to understand the feeling of the very world you understood falling apart under such gigantic changes.

    Understandably, that's what continues to follow. A man (narrated through Kanye) goes to jail for hitting his wife. When he comes back, he goes home to find his wife with another man. The verse ends with Kanye declaring, "I had to take him to that Ghetto University!"

    And throughout all of this, Kanye sounds utterly paranoid. Which is perfect. Before Rhianna gets to sing the refrain again, Kanye blurts out in venting fashion, "Cop lights, flash lights, spotlights, strobe lights, street lights," before Rhianna joins his for a sung, "All of the lights," after which Kanye gets in again with, "Fast life, drug life, thug life, rock life, every night!"

    Which, of course, only makes sense. If you're in the spotlight, everything you do is going to be shown and fully present: the good and the ugly. And it's under those lights that Kanye is so frantic, so desperately paranoid. Because, the lights ensure one other thing - you can't hide. The world is falling apart, (probably even more terrifyingly because) it's your fault, and all of this is on sight for everyone. It's no wonder that Kanye delivers his lines with a near delirium.

    The second verse is about as short as the first, opening with, "Restraining order/Can't see my daughter:/Her mother, brother, grandmother hate me in that order," and detailing the narrator's desire to see his daughter, even going as far to stupidly say, "Told her, she take me back -/I'll be more supportive." The verse ends with the lines, echoing the end of the first verse, "She need her daddy/Baby, please/Can't let her grow up in that Ghetto University!"

    The first time I heard the phrase, I thought it was stupid. Most poor phrasing from Kanye to vaguely describe thoughts that aren't fully fleshed out. But then I thought about the contrast he's making between the first verse and the second.

    In the first, he delivers the lines with an almost brag, despite the obvious hastiness in his voice. There's not really a sense that he feels like he did anything wrong, at least. Sure, he hit his wife. But she's with another man; clearly he should teach them a lesson and beat the crap out of the guy. School him in the ghetto: violence. You cross/fuck with me, I beat your ass.

    However, by the second verse, each line seems to be increasing the fear in his voice. By the time he hits, "Baby, please," it sounds like a terrible beg that's fighting to hold back tears. The Ghetto University line, however, sounds like downright fear. And it isn't the same as the first verse; no one is getting beaten up here. But both times something is getting schooled in the ghetto.

    And, really, what is a university? It's not just a school. It's higher education, that which is supposed to prepare you for life, give you the life lessons that you keep for life and will ensure your survival in the world. Yet this is not what he wants for his daughter. What would be the result? We might imagine it'd be the exact same as the father. When he shouts for her not to grow up in the Ghetto University, he's literally pleading for his ex-wife to not continue the cycle. Beautifully, Kanye is illistrating the way in which systems like the ghetto just wind up creating a cycle that falls back on itself (father's not there, kid grows up messed up, winds up in jail, repeats the same thing for his kids).

    Does this forgive the father? No; just as much as it doesn't forgive Kanye's outburst on the stage with Taylor Swift (or many of the other uniquely Kanye things Yeezy's good at). But it does make him more sympathetic.

    Honestly, My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy is an incredibly impressive album. I'm not sure if it's a perfect album yet (Kanye has an incredible knack for getting guest apprearances that completely don't realize what he was intending to do with the song. Nicki Minaj doesn't ruin "All of the Lights", though she doesn't add much either; though, in her defense, Kanye gave a lot of his guests strangely small space (Fergie's verse is, literally, like 4 lines), plus Nicki Minaj delivers one of the best verses of last year on "Monster"). Regardless, though, there are utter gems like this one on the album, plus - even if the verses aren't perfect - all of the production is absolutely perfect on every song. No lie. I'm not exagerating, 100%. If anything, it'll be wonderful ear candy for you.

    I highly suggest getting it.

  • I was going to say I've said before I really like discussions, about just anything, but I actually can't remember if I've really mentioned that here. I suppose it means little to say those statements considering there's probably only one person reading this thing still that's read it since even just high school (or knows me well enough to recognize the trait in me regardless of whether they've read it on here or not).

    Anyway, point is that I enjoy discussions. I like ideas and I like wrestling with concepts. Besides, as I know I've harped on over and over again before, I love personalities and any discussion is bound to tell you something about a person, let alone the argument the individual decides to take. Unfortunately, though, most people won't take you up on discussing a topic. Well, except maybe Connor, I'm finding more and more each time I talk to him.

    My brother, however, has the same kind of thirst for mental engagement that I do. The only real problem with this is that we tend to agree on most things, more often than not. So, often enough, our "conversations" turn into agreeing with how much we agree on a particular topic - or ranting, considering how much the topic infuriates us.

    The one thing we have continued to not agree on, however, is morality. I'm a moral absolutist, while he takes the route of moral relativism. I should, at this point, make clear that when I saw moral relativism, I do not mean of the kind that says, "In certain situations, certain moral concepts apply differently." For example, if you have the moral requirement You Shall Not Kill, that holds true if you just feel like killing someone but you would not be held guilty if you killed someone during the act of self-defense. Regardless the fact that any morality that's that rigid is idiotic (a debate we can pursue at a later time), that's not my brother's philosophy (or, at least, it might be but that would only be coincidental here). Rather, he believes that there is no real morality, only what people have decided as morality; in other words, what makes something particularly evil or good other than what people have said is good or evil? There's just things which are helpful to people or hurt people, not really morality.

    You might ask how we've come to such a concept (since it isn't, to my knowledge, the way most people think about morality). Basically, both my brother and I are secularists. So, if there is, indeed, a god, then ze dictates what is right or wrong. There, done. Morality in a nutshell. Of course, what if there isn't a god? Does morality go to shit? Can I go and steal anything I want? Can I commit adultery? Will the world IMPLODE?!

    Scary thoughts.

    As I said above, I would answer, "No." Morality is independent of god, I would argue. Being the religious one of the two of us, I'd in fact say that morality is dictated by god; the entire purpose of a god/gods dictating morality is because ze/they are supposed to watching over us. Of course, that in itself could lead on to many other fascinating discussions and then even more when you consider the concept of a god/gods not dictating a proper morality. However, I'll try not to splinter like I usually do.

    My brother, on the other hand, would respond that there, indeed, is no morality. I'd say I'm guessing at this point, but I imagine he would say that people would likely come together, realizing they dislike being hurt/whatever and then construct a society that matches this. And, what do you know, isn't that kinda what our society is like? I think he'd argue that the fact that there is no morality is not an invitation or argument for lawlessness but simply a statement of fact. How can something be good or evil unless something commands it to be so? I mean, what we fall back towards is having to define good and evil and then defining why particular actions are so, if they even are. Or maybe even more simply than that, why should we not kill someone? Why is it something we shouldn't do? What makes it, to counter my own argument, universally a thing we shouldn't do? After all, if such moors and concepts of good/evil change over time and from culture to culture, are they really as inherently bad as we see them now or are they only so terrible in our time, in our society?

    It's a hard argument to counter, I'll most certainly give him that. One, in fact, that I wasn't sure I could counter half the times we debated the topic. Yet, he pushed me to parse it out, and I believe I've come to a conclusive counter argument to bring our debate to a close. So, dear brother, here is my answer - hopefully for good (both he and I have a taste for hyperbolic language and winding and long speech too, I admit...).

     

    Let me start by saying that I think all human labels are social constructions. The world comes to us as is and then we make labels and containments for everything. However, that doesn't make everything any less real, right? This isn't a new concept and one we'd all readily recognize if we were to think of any time we've had a conversation with someone where we didn't define something the same way. "You define a hand as having five fingers? I simply call something a hand if it's able to hold something." Okay, the realism of my example is being stretched here. But it makes a very valid point. For humans, there physically is a thing, for most, which has five of what we call fingers and a very specific shape and make up. The particular specifics may vary (size, size of knuckle, etc.) but certainly something of a similar and universal makeup physically exists. As such, we've come up with a name for such an physical thing that, generally speaking, has five finds and is attached to what we call a wrist - a hand. The name may change, it may alter over time (due to evolution or otherwise), and it may have deformations, but it still is real, exists, and is actual.

    So, our labels can be used to define a specific thing. They can become more specific (for example, including size to specify Jill's hand) or less specific (to define an appendage), but they talk about something which is concretely real. Of course, they can become abstract and, as such, more subjective (do we consider a paw to be a hand as well or, at least, similar to a hand) but that does not remove the actuality of either a paw or hand. The words "paw" and "hand" simply are our way of defining these actual things.

    Of course, labels can sometimes be insufficient. When I say, "Race is a social construction," I guess I really don't mean that race doesn't exist. I simply think it's a poor thing to label. Yes, people have different skin colors. This is readily clear. But is it even useful to use such categorizations in this present day as "black" and "white" when so many are, for example, being multiracial? Or when we consider that just a century ago the Irish were considered to be "another race" before the concept of a monolithic "white race" was established? Or when some (I hate to point fingers, but here's looking at you Italians (or Greeks, really)) seem dark enough to be questionably "white"? Or perhaps we just have, for centuries of time, done a sloppy job of defining race, seeing as often things beyond just skin color are taken into consideration, such as nose size and shape or shape of jaw (yes, I'm going old-school racist here). Or how about the many ways ethnicity and race tend to be conflated (so that, for the longest time, I had no friggin' idea what either stupid thing was). Let's be honest - "race", whatever that ambiguous label is, is a poor means of measuring things.

    But that does not remove the existence of those physical things such as skin color or nose shape.

    Of course, these are all items we can literally grasp. What about abstract concepts? Do they function the same way? Well, is there an action that actually exists under the label of killing?

    Yes. Yes there is.

    So, here is my argument: perhaps morality is poorly defined. Perhaps the definition has changed from culture to culture. Perhaps the word didn't have any meaning to a particular culture but historians, recognizing certain trends in the culture that fit under their vague and general definition of morality, gave certains actions and customs this label in the history books.

    My point is, let's abandon the labels for a second. A very difficult and confusing way to talk about things, yes, but bear with me. So morality is undefined. We know things like jelly are already defined. So we can probably agree (assuming you don't want to redefine things at the moment) that morality isn't going to define anything like that. Likewise, certain abstract concepts are defined (such as the act of killing or the concept of philosophy or logic). So, we know that morality has to be defined as something specific generally. And, I would argue, we would find that (to be general enough) morality is always defined as (or at least pertaining to) the ways we should or should not act towards people. Should we do this or do that? Given the need to define both good and evil to include this definition, I won't say what is good or evil. But what we should or shouldn't do.

    Alright, workable definition. We're making progress.

    The next question, of course, is how do we make a decision about what we should or shouldn't do? And here, of course, is where we enter into many different wonderful arguments. Should it concern what allows a society to survive the longest? Should it pertain to how the action makes a person feel? Why or why not for all of these?

    And it is here that I will not provide some concrete example to guide us. After all, the question this argument is trying to settle is not "What should be the right morality?" but simply "Can there be a universal morality?". I will simply say that once a morality that guides what our actions should or should not be in daily life is chosen, we can move on.

    Of course, this still allows for multiple moralities, yes? I define morality one way, they define it a different way. Same problem we had at the beginning of this discussion.

    My argument is that such moralities would be first determined by the worthwhile-ness of their Whys. As I said above, "Should [morality] concern what allows a society to survive the longest? Should it pertain to how the action makes a person feel? Why or why not for all of these?" The Why. For example, you might argue that everyone's actions should focus around making you happy and only you, regardless of how it effects anyone else. However, you would probably have a difficult time justifying how that form of morality has any use for anyone else outside of you and how it makes any logical sense as pertanent to anyone else in terms of why they should or should not do certain actions.
    (you could probably ask why use enters into this discussion, to which I would counter back that morality would then have no point whatsoever if not to rest upon its use to you. Basically, why you should or should not do something either has no use that's derived from it or benefit or result and then it's basically pointless, or there's a reason we should do it, whether that reason be personal benefit for every individual or to keep the planet from dying, etc. But, as you can see, there needs to be some use or reason for its existance. We then decide which reason is the best)

    The Why decided, we must then commence with defining our basic actions (and then complex actions) around this particular focus of this morality. Of course, you could easily counter back that this isn't how morality generally works. Interesting concept. Does morality have to circle around a particular point? Or does it just have to instruct us on what to do and what not to do? Or, could that particular point simply be "God told us so"?

    And it is here that I must appease to logic. If you choose not to use logic, sure, fine. That's your personal choice. And if you choose to engage in a morality that does not follow logic, that - again - is your personal choice. But if you choose to transgress outside of a morality that follows logic, those who follow this logical morality are in the right to prosecute you since their morality has a purpose which is of some use (see argument two paragraphs above for each morality following logic having a use). "Why is theirs superior?" you might ask. And I would allow you to argue your case but, alas, that requires logic. And, were you to concede this and enter into logic to make you argument, you would instantly defunct your morality given that it does not adhere to logic and therefore fails in logic.

    So, working within the confines of logic, we can agree that something which follows logic must have a justification for why it works. Given that we defined morality as what we should or should not do, our morality should focus around some reason for our actions which justifies that basic tenant (what we should or should not do), likely found in the Why.

    So, back to two paragraphs ago: we must then commence with defining our basic actions (and then complex actions) around this particular focus of this morality. And the final justification to clear out any conflicting points is that our morality must follow logic too. Therefore, having a commandment "You shall not kill" and yet also having a commandment to kill anyone born with only one leg just for the Hell of it would not make sense and, therefore, be defunct in a morality. Given that moralities should have a specific purpose, such illogical points should be striken. We might also argue, then, that there isn't a satisfiable reason as to kill people with only one leg. Perhaps it doesn't match the purpose of the morality (really, the purpose of all moralities, given that only one would be chosen after logically assessing all of the Whys for the various moralities).

    If we do that, we must logically come to an all encompassing morality that reaches a point. Even if there are some things we decide people can individually decide whether to do or not to do, we are still agreeing that it isn't something that should be repremanded either way. Every action is chosen whether or not to be looked down on or not. By logical deduction, we can come up with a completely superior morality.

    And this is what we mean by an absolute morality. It is a morality that makes complete sound sense logically and that answers the only question that morality can point to (of course, it doesn't matter if our word for morality changes for the question is still there and can be answered, as I explained at the beginning of this).

    An absolute morality exists, Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

  • So, I've mentioned many (many) times on here, often in (sometimes snide) off-handed remarks, that I think very (very) highly of the album Reasonable Doubt by Jay-Z. The natural follow up question would be, "Why?"

    If you even remotely know me, you'll know that I often and readily complain about pop music. While I think there can be decent arguments made in defense of it (and the stuff often makes fantastic character studies, as you'll see soon enough), I think most of it (if not all of it) is the industry and often artists trying to cash in on a quick buck. This is particular true for rap music. For a genre that was born out of the really screwed up black experience starting back towards the 70s, it was not a genre that should have gone commercial so soon.

    While Rock 'n' Roll (amongst other genres) were able to articulate (initially) uncomfortable human experiences and taboo emotions in a relatively safe, artistically healthy, and (often) sane way, rap has taken all the gritty and uncomfortable aspects of (majoridly) black life in America - you could make an argument for just referring to it as urban life these days, though that notion steals away some importance from the origins of what birthed this monstrosity - for the past 4 decades and blasts it in defiance, realized it can capitalize off of it, and, in a mix of the mentality of getting out any way you can and honest gusto, twisted and convoluted the stereotypes that came to frame the genre and cemented them. Again, fascinating to study, not so good in terms of being an art-form.

    That's why something life "Airplanes" by B.o.B. feat. Haylay Williams or even "Billionaire" by Travie McCoy feat. Bruno Mars (even though the honest reciting of the mental effect of being starved of monetary value on the latter song does honestly annoy the Hell out of me) are welcome changes to the scene of rap. After all, the genre was built off of sampling music.

    To quote No Good Advice, "after all, techno was invented by escapist black kids in Detroit who were obsessed with Kraftwerk, and disco bands like Chic (as if the name wasn't enough of a clue) based their aesthetic on a Roxy Music-derived euro-penthouse cool a million miles removed from '70s funk. Disco evolved into house, and early hip-hop went from sampling Chic to assimilating European synthpop and inventing electro. Only in the late '80s did acts like Boogie Down Productions, Eric B & Rakim and Public Enemy transform hip-hop's sonic palette by dropping the more synthetic elements in favour of samples from pre-disco funk, particularly James Brown."

    That rap might sample rock or use rock influences only recalls back the (rather thin and in the past) connection they have from being birthed out of the conglomerate of many jazz influenced genres, of which include funk (Jimi Hendrix, anyone?).

    However, as No Good Advice also (rather well) points out both here and here, recent pandering to both rock and Euro-pop/dance influences seem to be, once again, intents to just sell as much as possible and appeal to as large an audience as possible. I've considered, quite seriously, of using the phrase Artistry is Dead for the past decade. Leastwise, it seems, when it comes to commercial rap.

    There's a reason some rap-heads get caught in a certain time frame. In the 90s, they were complaining that rap had died and it should go back to the 70s/early 80s. The entire past decade, we've wondered what happened to Hip Hop's golden age and why we can't go back to the 90s.

    And, admittedly, rap for me still is turn-tablism/sampling and lyricism (flow, wordplay, and rhyme) - gritty production and sparse sampling. But the sampling has changed; that's fine, even to be expected. I don't want to mire the genre. Better production or sampling outside of jazz/funk is not going to make me say that it isn't Hip Hop or bad rap. But, while the production towards the end of this decade has shot utterly up in quality (it had to - that's how they sell), I have yet to get any decent lyricism. Leastwise, not to an astounding extent. And, I mean, the production has been good. Kanye almost never ceases to amaze on that end and, while I dislike the song, the production on "What You Say" by Jason Derulo is enough to make my legs go weak.

    But, I'm a Hip Hop purist. I want lyrics. I grew up off of underground Detroit rap. I grew up listening to freestyles done in random radio studios in low-lo-def quality. I've listened, readily, to tracks with so much noise that you can barely make out the mc.

    At the end of the day, I breath lyricism. Often times, a track (that has a heavy beat/percussion) without sufficient rap over it won't cut it for me. I almost wanted to personally thank Kanye at the beginning of "Good Morning" because he had finally used multi-syllabic rhyme out of all the songs I had listened to of him at the time (it was like, "Please, do something relatively lyrical!!").

    As you might guess, I love the Hip Hop culture (and how rap fits into that). But I'm not above calling out its flaws. That's part of the reason I do find myself often looking for alternative rap. I just want good rap, even if that rap has ventured into new places so that only the roots are still present (much like jazz and funk did with the blues, only less so).

    So, while I love 90s rap...I can't just straight up say that it's satisfying.

    "Juicy" by the Notorious B. I. G. is a great song...but ultimately it's the basic rags to riches story. Admittedly, I love (rather guiltily) "Got a Story to Tell" and it's a fantastic demonstration of a minimalist beat and the power of story telling and delivery in rap. But it also furthers the black-on-black harm so prevalent (and socially ingrained) in the black community and the way that it continually diverts attention away from the real problems that could be dealt with.

    "N. Y. State of Mind" offers one of the best phrases out of rap (I still have a hard time thinking it's not some common saying made up a longer time ago) - I never sleep, 'cause sleep is the cousin of death. Plus "Never put me in your box if your shit eats taps" remains one of my favorite (and best delivered) punchlines ever. Not to mention the production is defining, iconic, and to die for. But beyond that...damn it, I just can't get into this song. The description of the shoot out always seemed corny to me and the album as a whole doesn't seem to tell me anything or give me any useful character insight. It's a vague description of a poorly defined immature youth that doesn't give me any sympathy for him. Maybe they were right in that you couldn't understand it unless you lived it - but I still don't see how that's not a flaw in the album.

    Sure, "Dear Mama" by 2Pac is a touching song. But this is also the same guy who proclaimed so loudly "M.O.B. - Money Over Bitches 'cause they breath envy" along with many other equally questionable lyrics.

    And, yes, The Chronic articulated the culture at a time when no one was listening - it's lyrics are still utterly ugly.

    Now, I'm being cursory. I've never believed in so black and white of arguments. But, for being cursory, this is accurate (of the stuff I've mentioned). Hip Hop had an amazing ability to bring out important aspects - without ever resolutely dealing with them. My brother recently showed me rapgenius.com. And it actually has had me gain slight more respect for artists such as Lil' Wayne. But I still stand by my previous statement.

     

    So...why Reasonable Doubt? It's the only album that provides lyricism and a greater sense of subject mater that resolutely deals with itself rather than seeming to be a spewing of streaming consciousness laid out on a track.

    Not to say that hasn't been done before. "Somebody's Gotta Die" by Biggie is a perfect song, as far as I'm concerned. While not necessarily preachy or with a sense of preaching, it details the situation with realism (and beautiful story telling) while keeping the cold facts of reality in the picture (i.e. yes, violence opens up many possibilities and opportunities - but you're not the only one living in this world and others will be affected); this was what seemed to have fallen out of the picture on "Niggas Bleed".

    Which isn't to say Reasonable Doubt is a perfect album either. Admittedly, I'm still trying to wrap my head around how Jay ever though "Cashmere Thoughts" ever fit on an album about hustling. Yet, outside of two songs, Reasonable Doubt presents an album that acutely focuses around a topic and, through the tracks, examines and assesses this topic through what seems like a very solid and singular character. It's a fascinating personality study that has so many aspects that seem so utterly intended  so aware that I have a hard time thinking that much of this album could have been done on accident. And, really, this is mostly clearly illustrated on "Feelin' It".

     

    "Feelin' It" is the track I give to people who I want to hook into the album (or just rap in general). Backed by the smoothest piano loop possibly ever, it sounds just gorgeous and catchy, complimented by a hook by Mecca that just tops it off. It's a clear demonstration of sampling back in the 90s and the essential origin of rap, yet it doesn't have the still blatant evident sound that it is only one piano snippet looped over and over (unlike "D'evils", which sounds like it was picked freshly off a record, with the scratching and all). In fact, for the longest time, I even thought it had accompaniment melodies until I really listened to it. Yet it's not as seamless and complex as "Can I Live". Beautiful Hip Hop still evident, from a purely physical level.

    And, with such an instrumental, it sounds like it should be nothing but bragging. Rather foolishly, on my review of Reasonable Doubt, I said that's all it was. It feels good, doing it's basic task really well. Not much wordplay, but the flow is righton (and incredibly hard to imitate). Plus his delivery, the enthusiasms in his voice, are all perfect. Not to mention it's some of the most intricate rhyme-wise that Jay ever gets. It does the job.

    How deceptive.

    Surely, it is bragging. It starts in the first bar, notably, "Crystals on ice; I like to toast, I keep on spilling it." The decadence is clear, as he actually brags about how tipsy he is. The most offensive line of the song comes with, "Transactions illegitimate 'cause life is still a bitch/And then you die - but for now, life, close your eyes and feel this dick..." Yet, his character is so firmly planted there. The delivery is perfect - he almost pulls it off so that it sounds like a classy and cool comeback.

    Admittedly, it's the addition of the alliterative, almost fast-paced rhyme that makes it so damn catchy. Just listen to this:

     

    Since diapers, had nothing to live for like them lifers but
    Making sure every nigga stay rich within my cipher
    We paid the price to circle us, success - they turned my mic up
    I'm about to hit these niggas with some shit that'll light they life up
    If every nigga in your clique is rich, your clique is rugged
    Nobody will fall cause everyone will be each others crutches

     

    On its own, it's not all too impressive. Admittedly, there's something to like about a confidence so large that you think you can enlighten another's life ("I'm about to hit these niggas with some shit that'll light they life up"). And the crutches line is barely ingenious, maybe a clever spur-of-the-moment quip. But backed with his delivery and the seductive rhyme, you can't help but enjoy it (I mean, listen to that rhyme! "that'll light they life up" Oh, that's so delicious...). Again, he has the gall to claim the ability to provide enlightenment ("I hope you fools choose to listen; I drop jewels, bust it/These are the rules I follow in my life: you gotta love it"). And then you can't help but smile at the last bar:

     

    Jiggy-jigga looking gully in the joint
    If y'all niggas ain't talking bout large money, what's the point?

     

    Even if it's just rhyming shit several times, the vocab and choice of words here is immaculate for every section of the verse. The use of gully and then the confident quip of confidence at the end continue to be addicting. Admittedly, this is well done bravado, artistically well done (even if not escaping the offenses that bravado can bring). It's not the blunt, often uninventive stuff you often hear now. There's definite talent being employed here.

    The second verse continues the absurd over-confidence with "Even if it ain't sunny - hey, I ain't complainin'/I'm in the rain, doing a buck 40, hydroplanin'" (I said to my brother once, and I repeat now, "hydroplaning"? Who rhymes that??).

    And almost as another blatant show of confidence, he pulls off using "shit" several times in a row on the ending, stressed rhyme:

     

    Ya feelin' it? To all the girls that bought a girdle to conceal my bricks
    No doubt, they can vouch, my life is real as shit
    95 South and Papi on the Hill and shit
    And all the towns like Cambridge that I killed with shit
    And all the thorough-ass niggas that I hustle with
    Throw your joints in the air one time and bust your shit
    These fake rappers can't really know I'm lovin' it; ya feelin' it?

     

    Yet notice that last line. They can't know that he's really loving it? Since when, once, in this song did he lead us to think otherwise? In fact, he's made it seem like the totally best thing in the world! From being able to drink Crystal until you can't stand up straight, to being as real as it gets with all the illegal activity - I thought he was living the life, right??

    Enter the third verse. Interestingly enough, of all things, he bring up his mother: "I keep it tight for all the nights my momma prayed I'd stop/Said she had dreams that snipers hit me with a fatal shot". Yet he brushes it off immediately with, "Those nightmares, ma..." And yet, he immediately contradicts his claims that there's no reason to worry with, "Those dreams that you say you've got - give me the chills/But these mils, well, they make me hot. Y'all feel me". But I don't think we do at this point. That statement of "Y'all feel me" sounds more like a weak attempt at reassurance.

    And notice that. For a character who was confidently telling us what to believe, what we should do in terms of him, he's now asking us for reassurance. It's not a demand anymore - it's seeking confirmation. His statement are no longer (really) rhetorical, though he might be trying to pass them off as such.

    And then the interesting line - "Enough to stop the illin', right?" I personally think he's referencing a desire to turn to drugs. Yet the connotation is clearly negative here. Illin' is now being used as a negative phrase, a desire for drugs, acknowledging that they hurt your body. And yet the irony is delightfully there - usually illin' is used as a slang for "killin' it" or something of that nature. Or you're "ill" if you have tons of money. But this line is immediately followed by "But at the same time these dimes keep me feelin' tight". Sounds a little confusing, right? He agrees. This is immediately followed by this almost diminished, "I'm so confused..."

    Wait, hold up? What happened to our ridiculously pompous and confident individual? The confidence is completely gone. The character is confused, backtracking over what he's said and retracting statement. If you want anymore evidence, look at the next bar: "Okay, I'm getting weeded now: I know I'm contradicting myself/Look, I don't need that now". He seems paranoid (which might make sense, seeing as that line is followed by: "It's just once in a blue moon when there's nothing to do...and/The tension gets too thick for my sober mind to cut through").

    When I first noticed this, it seemed far too important a distinction to let go. I mean, think about it. We're used to rap by now. We're used to the notion of bragging and saying you're the best. We're used to singles (this was a single when the album came out) being used to generate buzz and fitting a certain format. In fact, clearly Jay did, seeing as the clean (e.g. censored) version of the song actually has a completely different ending. Without spoiling too much in the next paragraph, let's just say that the fantasy he dreams about is presented as real in the clean version. And that's significant! Even he knows that won't sell. You have to be determined to put this in here and you have to be aware that you are completely undermining the very instrumental and hook that you're using.Are you feelin' it...I'm actually calling into question entirely what I've just bragged about. Umm, what? Most radio listeners don't like introspective (leastwise, not too much) characters. They want it nice and easy, black and white.

    But it gets better. After puffing some weed, Jay gets

     

    ...to zonin': me and this chick on the L and then we're bonin'
    I free my mind; sometimes I hear myself moanin'
    Take one more toke and I leave that weed alone, man
    It's got me goin'! Shit...

     

    Whoa. Did he just admit to masturbating to himself while high? Mr. "hit these niggas with some shit that'll light they life up"? I don't think that's what they had in mind, Jay.

    And that's the beauty of the track. It builds up this overly confident, borderline unlikable character - just to utterly rip him down. That's the life? Masturbating in your room alone, dreaming about a girl because of the stress? I particularly love (and, of course, his delivery of) the line, "I free my mind; sometimes I hear myself moanin'". It perfectly catches that emotion notion - that idea of accessing his own emotions. He frees his mind and sometimes he can hear himself moaning. It's an eerie image. But it notes that he's hiding from his own activity. And yet, that activity is the only recognition of his own feelings (when he's, otherwise, pretending life is just peachy for everyone else). He's hiding from it but at the same time he sounds like he's looking for it, trying to find it. It's ambivilent.

    And it's such miniscule details like that that make this track so delightful. And, in its own way, it captures it all. If you wanted a track which got at the reality of black life (in this case, hustling drugs), this is the type of track that does it well. That "feel this dick" line doesn't sound so harsh to our sensibilites because we know it's a cover up, a show. We're allowed the bravado while really getting to the inside of the character and understanding him, given the reality with the fiction.

     

    Complex, artistic, perfectly executed and well done, plus musically sound - THAT is what rap should be. Screw that commercial junk.

  • I said on here once, a year or more back, that one of my all-time top songs was "Trouble In Paradise" by Bruce Springsteen. I then proceeded to post the lyrics and left it at that.

    So, I guess just because it's late and this song is literally festering itself into my veins and also because I usually never do a post that really opens up about me except rarely (or one of my very often vague or difficult-to-articulate complaints about depression), I'll explain it a bit more.

    I guess, principally, it's like many of the other things I adore - it's a conglomerate mess of contradictions (or, more specifically in its case, unexpectations) that shouldn't work and yet do, plus it's utterly just joyful in the pleasure it provides.

    First and foremost, as the title "Trouble In Paradise" seems to imply, it's not the most uplifting song. However, if you weren't paying attention, you would think quite the opposite. The music, while simplistic, is utterly infectious. It just sounds utterly quaint and upbeat. It's the type of song I'd put on if I were languidly cleaning or cooking something in the kitchen - and enjoying every minute of it. It's just bouncy and pleasant. Really, it has the same effect that "Frankie" does (which, honestly, is really difficult to describe unless you listen to it), though Frankie has a bit more of a complicated arrangement.

    And I suppose that's what adds to my liking it. I have a thing for quaint and small (metaphorically/symbolically (as in lowered expectations for art) or literally) things which literally have no flaw. For example, an EP which only has 7 tracks and every track is great musically and maybe brings you a little into a new world. It's not perfect: first and foremost, it doesn't try to be the utter best it can be. Yet it has no actual detractions. You can't say the music is bad, even if it's not better than it is. There are some interesting themes, even if they aren't explored completely or aren't expansive enough. It's quaint.

    The issue I have? I've become very picky and demanding in my art. I will certainly enjoy the piece. But it's not something I can show someone to fully experience the true power of art. If we're looking and aiming for the best - well, it's not it. It's the difference between the breath-taking experience of Reasonable Doubt vs. Straight From the Lab EP. So, I'm immediately pulled to the song. And that's another one of the wonderful contradictions I love about "Trouble In Paradise" - it's deceptively simple. Sure, the instrumentation (very much) is. But the themes (and, if you couldn't tell by now, the emotions it can evoke) aren't.

    So, while the song sounds catchily upbeat...well, the first bar and a half starts with:

     

    You do the drying
         I'll do the dishes...
    Who'll do the crying when all them wishes don't come true?

     

    Uplifting, yes? The song deals with relationships and the responsibilities therein. Yet, the lyrics are just as simplistic and quaint as the music as well as delightfully abstract. As you might glean from the bar and a half above, it starts with washing and drying dishes...and then talking about crying over unfulfilledwishes??? Yes, honey, I know I promised you a new washing machine, but we just can't afford one yet (because all wives want new home devices for doing chores at home - all women; silly feminists).

    No, rather the chores and jobs littered throughout the song ("You do the washing/I'll do the folding"/"You did the dusting/I did the sweeping") stand for basic jobs that might occur throughout a relationship (caring for the other person, being receptive, doing favors for them, etc.). Likewise, a series of similarly abstract disasters occur throughout the song:

     

    You do the washing
         I'll do the folding
    Whose heart is breaking when whose arms are holding someone new?

    Sittin' on a peaceful lakeside
    Didn't hear the roar of the waterfall come in
    When it's all a storybook story
    When it's all so easy and nice

    Here comes Trouble in Paradise

    [...]

    You did the driving - oh, and I did the sleeping a little too long

    On a picnic 'neath a sky so blue
    We didn't see the rain and heartache coming through
    When it's all a black and white movie
    And you're sure you've seen the ending twice

    Here comes Trouble in Paradise

     

    I just love the imagery. I remember, back in probably around middle school (kinda weird thinking it's actually been that long since I read it), I read this book. I would actually like to re-read it, if I ever I remembered what it's called. But, towards the end of it, in trying to convince this boy to come out and be social (his brother abused him for the longest time), she remarks that the movie is an old black-and-white where everything turns out alright in the end and life is good.

    And it's such a great symbol, in that light. Everything was fine and dandy, right? Just go on auto-pilot, fall into comfortable routines and things will proceed just fine? But no...you were sleeping too long, imbuing neglect. And the rain came down in showers. The language is, in essence, very simplistic - but I just love that vivid second to last stanza above.  It evokes such images and emotion.

    And, speaking of, Bruce once again demonstrates his ability to nail a performance just right, in a way that really aids in how you see the song. In as close to literal as the song every gets, he delivers perfectly:

     

    You said everything was fine
         I'm sorry, baby, I didn't see the signs
    Oh, so beautifully you read the lines...
    In a play where the hero has no vice
    And love comes without a price

    So does Trouble in Paradise

     

    That second line - it's like the line "I'm a thief in the house of love and I can't be trusted!" in "Roll of the Dice". It's delivered so perfectly, capturing the frustration and desperation as well as the regret all together, and then followed by the next line in regretful defeat.

    It's all so beautifully descriptive, so that even the abstract way of telling it adds to the message it's trying to convey, in how it tells us how easily "all of love's glory and beauty/Can vanish before you think twice" from forgetting that basic notion of any relationship - it's give and take. There are certain obligations when it comes to caring and leaving the mess cleanup for the other guy (metaphorically speaking), whether intentional or accidental, obviously isn't going to leave him or her feeling satisfied or cared about. Even that simple title does the excellent job of getting to the emotional root of it all - Trouble in Paradise.

    It's really a great song and I won't ruminate on the rest of the lyrics so you can enjoy them yourself.

  • To be brutally honest, I've never fully liked Alice In Wonderland. It's really nitpicky, what I'm sure my cousin would call elitist reasons. That said and regardless, I always find myself drawn back to it. Whether it's Nick Willing's Alice, American McGee's Alice, or television adaptions such as this one (fans of Napoleon Dynamite will love the casting choice for Alice), I always find myself enjoying offspring of the books.

    I should probably put it this way: in total, I am not happy with Alice In Wonderland; however, it has many moments of brilliance which make faithful remakes of the original totally enjoyable.

    So, when I saw the trailer for Tim Burton's Alice In Wonderland, I was skeptical. As anyone who knows me knows, I love Burton. Nightmare Before Christmas and Edward Scissorhands are fantastic and delightful. Beetlejuice is one of my all time favorite movies. Corpse Bride is Burton at his traditionally most realized.

    Yet, well, he screwed up my Hatter. I prefer the Hatter in a more traditional making, quite like American McGee's before he gets demented (see the opening movie of the video game to see what I mean). Johnny Depp is not that Hatter.

    Yet, after seeing the movie today...well, it's Burton's best yet, I think. It's everything by him at it's most realized. I don't think I've seen so perfectly flawless a movie since The Exorcist, Shortbus, or Show Me Love.

    You have to first realize that it is not a remake of the first two books but a sequel. That is an important fact. For, artistically, it opens up very different paths and expectations.

    And in that vein, Burton has created a movie that stays true to the books, often in ways that fit the madcapped tone that simultaneously stays true to the books' lunacy and fits Burton's own, capable at times of embellishing self-consciously (I didn't know tone could do it 'til now) until it becomes something else entirely, both familiar and different. And yet in so many ways it still allows signature Burton themes to roam free.

    The artful and insane landscapes that so often make his movies (Edward Scissorhands comes to mind) as well as the utterly on-point thematic nature of the film. No matter how crazy it became or what it was doing, it was flawless in terms of shots, landscape, and musical score for every scene.

    And for a book that was literary nonsense, the movie maintains this while bringing coherency on some level at all times (often the emotional one).

    That probably doesn't describe it right or clearly. But oh well. It was amazing and I'm buying it the second I get the chance.

  • "A Letter from God to Man" by Dan Le Sac Vs. Scroobius Pip seemed really great, but some of those lines really just make me scratch my head. Shame. The only thing worse than something bad is something which comes so close to being great, but has a few flaws which holds it back.

  • I watched District 9 a couple of days ago. While I had very high expectations for it...I was disappointed. I was actually surprised how much so. I was going to write in detail about it, but I'm tired and have already done so on Facebook. Therefore (while I still do love you all), I'm simply going to quote what I wrote on Facebook:

    First, I agree entirely with you, A-----, that the special effects and acting were phenominal. And I loved the documentary style and how they did it, maybe because it was just so different from normal movies.

    Second, my complaint actually wasn't that it wasn't happy. I like the depressing, the warped, etc. The aliens got away, anyway - to me, that's a happy ending (at least partially).

    R------ - the basic plot of the movie is that a alien mother ship stops over a part of South Africa and is unable to move further on. Eventually, the government drills into the ship to find millions of starving aliens aboard.

    The government builds a bunch of low income housing and the place easily turns into a ghetto. Poverty, crime, et cætera. People stereotype the aliens, assume they want to kill humans for the fun of it, ban them from different establishments (there are signs reading Humans Only), et cætera.

    The idea is that it's supposed to be an allegory for apartheid South Africa (or, at the very least, racism or marginalized group descrimination).

    Here's my complaint. While, yes, it opperates quite well like a regular action flick (actually, too much so; without the advanced concepts, it's strickingly like a formulaic action movie) and has the basic concept of this allegory of suffering and prejudice, let's shed the allegory for a bit and actually look at the aliens as a suspect class and marginalized group.

    While some parts are *perfect* (like the woman commenting about how the aliens will take over a buisness and kill everyone while, in the background, an alien is digging through the garbage for food), there's the aspect that nearly ALL the whites in the movie are in position of power, all the blacks (except a select few) are in positions of poverty, gangs, etc.

    Well, this is just accuracy of current South Africa (caused by apartheid) - fine. But that means different levels of damage against marginalized groups (the descrimination and isolation of the aliens) and the results of the above on sociol-economic issues for blacks. This isn't addressed. Rather, all humans are treated in a color-blind fashion (despite the obvious racial division throughout the movie) and the aliens are thought of sadly only because of the actions taken against them by the humans. The movie could have probed these different levels and effects of descrimination through these different levels - but it doesn't.

    My second complaint was the blatant descrimination toward the alien within the movie itself.

    First off, Wikus is pretty much an abhorrent character at the beginning. On top of clearly being xenophobic, he happily massacres tons of babies, and he's a spineless twat.

    Of course, that's just the beginning. And I like the concept of giving us a character like that to see his development. I actually really like that concept.

    Here's the problem though - he doesn't really adequately change. The worst part is when he decides to steal Christopher's ship and doesn't bother to even flinch when he hears the poor guy being beaten above him as his son looks up, asking "Father?". In fact, as the boy then looks toward Wikus in fear, Wikus just lies to the kid and says it'll be alright. I mean, how do you do that and live with yourself?

    And THEN, after crashing the only means that Christopher has to get home, he has the audacity to try to fun away when he's in a full metal body suit and could have easily saved Christopher when he's, once again, getting the living shit beat out of him.

    And then there's the fantastic aspect that Wikus continues, way until the end of the movie, to refer to Christopher as a Prawn, a term already clearly defined and well known to be derogitory towards the group. If we are to use the allegory of an apartheid South Africa, the aliens can be thought of as blacks. It's essentially like calling them niggers the whole movie through.

    The issue with this slow and rediculous character development for Wikus is...he's the main character and he's gets so much focus it's rediculous. I mean, it's one thing to have the plot like this but then we focused on Christopher. But, no, it's pretty clear our sympathies are meant to go towards Wikus.

    Christopher is the one who's been isolated in South Africa, has his people shot with no issue, has them starved and cheated in this ghetto - and we're focusing on Wikus.

    I mean, there wasn't even much sympathy given towards Christopher. In the scene that *should* have been really powerful (when he finds the room where they're expirimenting on his people) - the damn camera stays on Wikus most of the time! I mean, is it human-centrism? I don't get it. Regardless, for a movie trying to point out the cruelties of one to another, it's a pretty bad slap to the face to focus on the human so singularly when the cruelties are happen ten-fold to the other species.

    Basically, District 9 had amazing potential. They could have really probed the different levels of descrimination in a really creative way, as I mentioned above. Rather, they just ignored it.

    Then they could have *at least* given attention to the plight of the aliens. There are racist movies from the 90s with a black and white main characters thatare more sympathetic and better at highlighting the marginalized character as a multi-dimentional character than District 9 was.

    Sorry; I was really disappointed.

     

    I think I'm going to do an album review of Darkness On the Edge of Town. Music makes me happy and an album review would require me to submerge myself in the album for a while in order to do a proper review. Plus I actually want to go through old Bruce stuff that I've listened to for ages but never given a critical eye to. It also lets me probe and explore this music I love in more depth.

    In other news, I have to write a 10 page paper for my Atheism class by Thurs. While it's a topic I actually will enjoy (arguing that religion is not the cause for evil but often the tool used by others to cause evil)...I don't want to write a 10 page paper (that's longer than anything I had to write for last semester, with my 4 English courses. Then again, had I not been given caps on pages, I could have easily hit 10). Plus it means doing research for it.

    Alright, it probably won't be that difficult, but I feel lethargic. Heh, and second semester is coming up. Joys and yays.

  • Alright, I'm going to do my review of Bruce Springsteen's Born to Run now because I said that I would, I haven't updated in ages, and Bruce always makes me happy (no matter what – ignore the slightly obsessive tone of that...).

    I'd say that the first thing you would have to know when approaching this is that, around this time, Bruce was known to romanticize a lot of his characters. He'd often focus on the down and out, misunderstood characters and celebrate them. Perfect example would be "Zero and Blind Terry". Terry falls in love with Zero, who is the leader of a gang. Terry's father dislikes this, knowing that Zero is a "child, a thief, and a liar". He sends troopers to hunt down Zero and bring Terry back. At the end of it, as time passes, Zero and Terry become the stuff of legends:

     

    Well now some folks say Zero and Terry got away
    Other said they were caught and brought back
    But still young pilgrims to this day
    Go to that spot way down by the railroad track
    Where the Troopers met the Pythons
    Old timers cry on a hot August night
    If you look hard enough, if you try
    You'll catch Zero and Terry and all the Pythons

    Oh just hiking them streets of the sky
    Just walkin', hiking the streets of the sky
    Just hiking the streets of the sky
    Hey Zero!...

     

    The album preceding Born to RunThe Wild, the Innocent, and the E Street Shuffle – is beautifully chocked full of that stuff. It's a phenomenal album, by the way. While often tinged with sadness, and certainly a sense of persecution, the general ending was rather upbeat and hopeful. Probably due to the need to actually do a hit album this time around (or be dropped from his record label), Born to Run lives up to its name – again, it's those outcast characters, but this time there's a sense that they must get out. They're running – from fears, to hope, to safety, et cætera. In terms of concept, this is followed by the next album, Darkness On the Edge of Town, where the questionable heroes succumb, rather awfully, to their own vices. That one's a gloriously dark album.

    However (going back to Born to Run), the lyrics, for me, is what makes this album absolutely delectable. It sounds very, very upbeat (for most of the songs). Yet the lyrics are some of the most frantic, desperate, and borderline reckless I've heard.

    Finally – the music. This is absolutely gorgeous in terms of composition. I remember reading somewhere that a critic was noting Bruce turning to traditional song structure at the turn of Darkness On the Edge of Town. And I had never simply recognized that before (maybe because I basically grew up on this stuff). For the most part, traditional song structure is abandoned. Both "Thunder Road" and "Born to Run" are just a beautiful bombardment of melodies and harmonies that you can't initially keep up with everything that's going on. Plus it largely consists of piano (most of the album is piano, given that it was first written for composition on the piano with the other instruments added later), guitar, and saxophone. It's utterly gorgeous. It's actually a shame I can't do more service to the music in description, for it deserves as much scrutiny as the lyrics. Acknowledging my own short coming, just trust it never disappoints.

    And that's when the album becomes dubious. On one hand, it's a Bruce album. That means that the lyrics can be utterly mind-blowing. Thus, I'm expecting them to be. I want to be amazed, poetically moved, emotionally shaken, et cætera. However, not all of the songs necessarily live up to this, lyrically. Musically, they're fantastic (like the whole of the album), which means they're alright songs. But in comparison to other songs on the album, they're less than we could get. Yet, on the other hand, they're consistent with the whole of the album. And that's something that I've really tried to keep in mind more with music. Yeah, the songs are all nice – but how does it all work as an album? And, in that sense, the album totally works together, painting a wholistic picture that even the lesser songs help to fill in.

    With all that said, onto the songs of this delightful album.

    Thunder Road – 5 stars
    And here's my first problem, right in the first song. For one, the lyrics are killer here. As this blogger said, "Actually you can close your eyes, put your finger down on the lyric sheet of “Thunder Road,” and you’d probably land on a line that has resonated through rock and roll history."

     

    Screen door slams, Mary's dress sways
    Like a vision she dances across the floor as the radio plays

     

    A tale of admiration, hope for romance when it's never guaranteed, and a desperation to cut loose from all the bullshit – everything which is holding you down or you were told you couldn't have – makes this song the definitive song for a dreamer.

    And, really, what a perfect way to start off the album. As he asks Mary to take his hand, trust him despite all the possible doubts that can arise, he's asking us to venture with him. Enter this world, enter these possibilities. It's not even just asking that dangerous question of whether to enter into a relationship, ripe with the chance that they might "turn me home again/[because] I just can't face myself alone again." It's that followed up demand that we have a right to what everyone else seems to have a right to. These characters are the outsiders, the outcasts. Whatever Thunder Road is, whether it's success in rock 'n' roll to finally get financial success and support or just means reaching happiness finally, a family, support, it's being daring enough to say you can have it after it being so elusive for so long.

    Again to indirectly quote the blogger, there's a reason why they have to "case" Thunder Road. They can't just go to it, they have to steal it. Yet by the time the chorus rises up, in the midst of that, "Oh, oh, come take my hand/We're riding out tonight – to case the Promised Land/Oh, oh, oh, oh! Thunder Road! Oh, Thunder Road!" you know that's it. Despite the worries of your dreams, despite that fact that it's "lying out there like a killer in the sun/Hell, [you] know it's late but we can make it if we run". Shit, who cares about the worries, the odds - this is it! This is our chance, our moment. Don't let it get away.

    Honestly, the lyrics of this thing are amazing, just drawing you in while barely letting you go. Once again repeating the blogger, the specificity of the lyrics leaves you with something that could move you without the music. The car, their access of getting out of town and escaping, is the only redemption they have left (Now I'm no hero, that's understood/All the redemption I can offer, girl, is beneath this dirty hood), again tying in with that concept of having to case the Promised Land. Yet this redemption isn't given and passed down by God. They don't meet that "Heaven waiting down on the tracks" by being granted. It's up to them. Again echoed through every level of the song, this is repeated once more to Mary, acknowledging that, yes, "[his car] door's open, but the ride/it ain't free". But I think I've clearly said enough. I'll allow you to further peruse the lyrics at your own leisure.

    The fault, ironically enough, comes from the music. Don't get me wrong, it's gorgeous. Not quite the maze of "Born to Run", but a pretty thrilling thing to listen to regardless. From the piano to the guitar, it's fantastic and executed perfectly: "Well, I got this guitar and I learned how to make it talk" – cue 2 second guitar solo. The issue is...it's too happy. Which, in and of itself, isn't a bad thing. It matches the rest of the album which is (I think) for the most part pretty upbeat.

    And why shouldn't it be? Sure, the lyrics are often afraid and anguished from the suffering, but this isn't an acknowledgement. This is a call to action, a fight back and a scream of rebellion that only rarely becomes downtrodden.

    And yet...I dunno. Maybe it's because for the longest time, at one point, I didn't have the original album and the only version I had of "Thunder Road" was the one off of In Concert/MTV Plugged. Then again, during that time, I had the version of "Born to Run" from Chimes of Freedom and both are very similar (stripped down to one or two instruments, a lot slower, and very sad). Yet I find "Born to Run" fine as it is. I just get left with this feeling like there's a disservice being done to the lyrics with the original. There's fear, very alive fear, in those lyrics. A slow, piano only version of "Thunder Road" seems to capture the spirit far more perfectly. The music works in the original, don't get me wrong. But the stripped down version does the song far more emotional justice and has a far greater emotional maturity. That wonder of Mary moving to the radio on the porch isn't lost. Yet when he asks her not to turn him home...God, you feel that pain.... It just...the original almost doesn't seem to compare. And yet, what could you do? The other version would be sorely out of place on the album. I'm giving it five stars, regardless, because it still fits with the whole of the album and is still a mind-blowing song. But the other version is far better.

    In spite of this, that end of the original is perfect. Whichever version, "Thunder Road" really isn't itself without it. Every time, slow or fast, it still manages to convey that sense of going forward. When it's slow, it's a steady, unstoppable plodding. When it's fast, it's a stampede, as if the feet are moving so fast that they trip over themselves in the rush and glory of it all. Either way - we're going somewhere.

    Tenth Avenue Freeze-out – 4 stars, if not for "Night" and "She's the One" it'd be a 5
    The lyrics aren't quite on par as some of the best on this album, sadly. As Mr. Ward (from American Studies) often said to me, it's the stories that really make the stuff that just draws you in (probably why The Wild, the Innocent, and the E Street Shuffle is one of the best albums ever, far as I'm concerned). Yet the second that main riff hits – from the long stretched note of the horn to the piano and guitar supplied groove, fuck, this is musical Heaven.

    I remember, when trying to re-listen to this album again, rediscover why so many love this album (since, admittedly, I grew up on this so it's mostly nostalgia and the fact that it sounds good that was driving my opinions. I missed a lot of the little things and I actually didn't play this album much other than 2 or three songs; that's changed now), I was comparing this version to the version off of the Live in New York album. It might have just been bad acoustics, but I think they tried to substitute the horns for just metal guitars. Which, admittedly, it works – but in comparison to the original, it practically seems a sin. The gorgeous lightness of the piano with the steady blasts of the horns and the guitar weaving its way through it all cannot be replaced.

    Plus – it just sounds like old rock (something that most people these days wouldn't know two things about, it seems). You can hear the jazz influences alive in it.

    A sort of fictional version of the creation of the E Street Band and Bruce's need for them for support, it packs plenty of emotion in its lyrics to keep it interesting.

     

    Teardrops on the city
    Bad Scooter [Bruce Springsteen] searching for his groove

    Seem like the whole world walkin' pretty
    And you can't – find no room – to – move

    Well, everybody better move over – that's all!
    'Cause I'm runnin'-on-the-bad-side and I got my back – to the wall

     

    Admittedly, not even Bruce knows what a Tenth Avenue Freeze-out is. You can always use your imagination, piece together clues from the lyrics and descriptions of the other songs on the album, or assume it's a term Bruce has made up and figure out the definition from the lyrics of the song.

    Regardless, it quickly becomes apparent that it's not so important what that one segment of the song is and that you should just realize the fantastic emotions that he's sending you are.

     

    I was standin' in the jungle
    Tryin' to take in all the heat they was givin'

    'Tiiiilll, the night is dark – but the sidewalk's bright
    And lined with the light of the livin'

    From a tenement window a transistor blasts
    Turned another corner, things got real quiet real fast

     

    Yeah, the story's been told time and time again and you could probably piece it together without hearing the song (given also the lyrics aren't that specific and kinda vague at some points). But it's that feeling of being at the cusp of just doing what you've always wanted to. That excitement, that frustration beforehand (I love the "teardrops" line), the bewilderment – just all of it. So that when the groove cuts away and the opening fanfare of the beginning before the groove hits kicks in, you feel that desperation

     

    And I'm aaaallllllllll alone...
    I'm all alone

     

    in spite of it being a song that you just want to get up and dance to. Clarence Clemons's (the saxophonist of the band) line "Now, kid, you better get the picture" sounds more like the parental warning of an older generation telling you this is how the world is, you can't do it this way, you're gonna fail. And the immediately following lines of

     

    And I'm oooonnnnnnn my own
    I'm on my own
    And I can't go hooommmmeeeee....

     

    just completes it as the groove kicks back in and the fear, the desperation, just feels like a part of life. By the time the last verse comes around, you're sold.

     

    Well, the change was made uptown
    And the Big Man [Clarence] joined the band [cue 5 second sax solo]

    Frrrrooooommm the coastline to the city
    All the little critters raised their hands

    I'm gonna sit back real easy and laugh
    When Scooter and the Big Man bust this city clear in half!

    Night – 3 stars
    Now, understand – it's not that "Night" is a bad song. In fact, as I re-look over the lyrics, I find them to be rather delicious in their own right (The rat traps filled with soul crusaders/The circuits lined and jammed with chromed invaders). Yet, in the end...well, it's just about escaping work. And, to be honest, most of the lines don't quite live up to that couplet. They come close, in their own subtle ways (noting that the highway "ignites" and then that last, fatalistic couplet "Somewhere tonight you run sad and free/Until all you can see is the night" really shocked me as I read them together, even after having listened to this song for years).

    But does it compare? It's like a sub-par version of everything. Which, for the boss, means some pretty decent shit regardless. But in comparison, it just doesn't match. It comes off feeling like more of a repeat, really (from the desperation, the crushing feeling of it all, and even the customary anonymous girl that is the narrator's desire).

    And, musically, I'm not really sold. Again, it's not bad...it's just not as good as it could be. There is an inability to deny "Tenth Avenue Freeze-out"; "Night"'s melody just doesn't quite excite me so.

    So, I give the track 3 stars because, in comparison to the other songs, it could've been better, not because it's a bad song. It deserves more stars if we're talking music in general, probably getting a 4. But on the scale of Born to Run, it gets a 3.

    Regardless of the rating, it still fills in the album. Because of its existence, we now get a vision of the worker who's just trying to make it through the day in the world that's being painted for us.

    Backstreets – 5 stars
    Finally, we get a truly depressing song on this album, other than "Meeting Across the River" (even though I feel "Meeting" actually isn't all that depressing). And...wow, is it fantastic.

    Once more, it's dealing with the concept of getting out. However, in spite of the anthems of "Thunder Road" and "Born to Run", it actually contemplates the failure. Yet, it's not really that their dreams failed. It's that they failed. While "Jungleland" warns of the possible destruction of their own environments and both "Born to Run" and "Thunder Road" seem like calls to escape it, "Backstreets" bemoans the results when they fail themselves so bitterly that it almost burns. The emotions are all there again, so desperate they seem ready to tear out of the song itself, but (with so terrible a subject matter) it seems, this time, ready to burn everything else down in its misery.

    The song beautifully starts out with a piano solo, weaving the melody that's to portray the whole song. The percussionist, Max Weinberg, provides a drum beat that sounds, fittingly, like a heartbeat. As the piano goes on, other instruments add in as the music rises in intensity, seemingly portraying the story of the song without words. Just as it rises in a final roar, it fades and then dies as the first stanza kicks in:

     

    One soft infested summer, me and Terry became friends
    Trying in vain to breathe the fire we was born in
    Catching rides to the outskirts, tying faith between our teeth
    Sleeping in that old abandoned beach house, getting wasted in the heat, yeahhh...
    Hhhiiiddinngg on the Backstreets
    Hhiiiding on the Backstreets
    With a love so hard and filled with defeat
    Running for our lives at night on them Backstreets

     

    It seems almost that the two's relationship is framed by that world they're trying so hard to stave off. Lost in a cruel and harsh world, they are their source of comfort, their reminder that there's still a reason to fight:

     

    Slow dancing in the dark on the beach at Stockton's Wing
    Where desperate lovers park, we sat with the last of the Duke Street Kings
    Huddled in our cars, waiting for the bells that ring
    In the deep heart of the night, we cut loose from everything – to go
    Rrruuunninngg on the backstreets
    Rruuuning on the backstreets
    Terry, we swore we'd live forever
    Takin' on them backstreets together

    Endless juke joints and Valentino drag
    Where dancers scraped the tears up off the streets dressed down in rags
    Running into the darkness: some hurt bad, some really dying
    At night, sometimes, it seemed you could hear the whole damn city crying

     

    Notably, there's continual language hinting at an inseparability from that darkness. As if timed by it, it determines when they release their own inhibitions in an attempt to escape it. While being abused by it, they run directly into that darkness.

    What is it? I'd like to think life. Likely to tie in with that theme thus far for the album of just people who have thrown you out, outcasted you, written up a bunch of hypocritical rules you couldn't hope to fit in, and all else you might think of along those lines, it could really be much more as well. Personally, there are easily themes of depression that I read out of darkness. Maybe they try to use that dark for their own sense of identity or comfort (dancers scraped the tears up off the streets dressed down in rags). I don't know. Regardless, it's a community of sufferers in the end (At night, sometimes, it seemed you could hear the whole damn city crying).

    In spite of that, I still argue that the failure lies in the characters themselves. For it's after that admittance of a whole city of sufferers that the narrator addresses that Terry leaves him. And by that point, he no longer cares about the rest of it all, not caring who is blamed or what it right or what is wrong, perhaps not even able to know anymore:

     

    Blame it on the lies that killed us
    Blame it on the truth that ran us down
    You can blame it all on me, Terry
    It don't matter to me now...
    When the breakdown hit at midnight
    There was nothing left to say
    But I hated him
    And I hated you...when you went away

     

    Bruce has been criticized before for an almost need on many songs to add some kind of noise in where there isn't lyrics being sung, making his own vocals ever-present. Perhaps there is good reason to question some of his odd, well, squeals at points of certain songs. This isn't one of those moments.

    Stripped of everything, it's a bellow of pure anguish. Without the use of words, he's communicated everything, almost as if everything so previously well done in the song wasn't needed.

    And it's in that stanza, I feel, that their own faults are revealed to be the cause of the final suffering, the defeat, and the admission of that defeat. For one, while (until the point where he says it's alright to blame him) the lyrics focus on blaming lies (a dream deterred?) and a truth they refused to face, if the blame didn't somehow lie with their own actions, it would ignore the kinda huge fact that Terry is leaving him.

    There's also the aspect that if the inescapable truth they refused to accept was there could be no change, no hope for something better, then Thunder Road is a myth (in terms of this album). Forget hoping for it, it's just a killer, nothing more. It's not a possibility of failure – it is failure.

    Interestingly, the breakdown hits at midnight, the pinnacle of darkness. Again, I think this is due to Terry's abandonment. But the thing that solidifies my belief in this is once the music fades for Bruce to whisper:

     

    Laying here in the dark, you're like an angel on my chest
    Just another tramp of hearts crying tears of faithlessness
    Remember all the movies, Terry, we'd go see?
    Trying to learn how to walk like the heroes – we thought we had to be!
    And after all this time, we find we're just like all the rest:
    Stranded in the park – and – forced – to – con-fess – to
    Hhhiiiddinngg on the Backstreets
    Hhiiiding on the Backstreets
    We swore – forever friends!
    On the Backstreets until the end

     

    I very well may be reading things which simply aren't there into this song, but I find that Terry and the narrator's relationship was supposed to represent difference. That darkness, those backstreets, that feeling of outsideness and outcasting that was bred from their environments is forever a part of them. As he says at the beginning of the song, "Trying in vain to breathe the fire we was born in." It's a difficult bit of gymnastics, incorporating the bad of your life with who you are. As someone with depression, I do it daily. There's a sense of identity. Yet there has to be more. After all, we're talking about a negative. On its own, it leaves a bleak view.

    "Trying to learn how to walk like the heroes we thought we had to be" – something is broken in her betrayal. A sense of heroism. A sense of something more. What it is, I can't rightly concretely articulate. But the result is them having to confess to hiding on the Backstreets. Every time these streets have been evoked, there was the concept of running and hiding on them. But there was no sense of judgment. The scenarios were given as they were, with the bad, good, and ugly consequences frankly spoken. But here is a blatant shame to the hiding that wasn't there before.

    They are stranded in the park – not moving, not going forward. This image of "just another tramp of hearts crying tears of faithlessness" leaves only the realization that they are just like all the rest: going nowhere, nothing special, nothing heroic. Like all the others just struggling to survive, running headlong into the darkness though it may kill them, the narrator and Terry are left only with the fire they are born in – nothing more.

    Born to Run – 5 stars
    The blogger I had mentioned earlier. As he was choosing his last songs, he placed "Born to Run" as the greatest Bruce Springsteen song. While that is so difficult a thing to choose, I remember thinking, "What?!?!" That overplayed, by now cliché song? I mean, don't get me wrong, it's a beautiful song, definitely huge at its time, and something I love. But it's almost too cheerful and not nearly as lyrically beautiful as some of Bruce's other works. Such opinions seem childish to me now.

    Really, the blogger said it the best, so I'm going to just let him speak for this one. Sometimes we get so used to something, we forget the impact, the gravity of those words:

    "Start with Ernest ‘Boom’ Carter’s opening drum shots, and then marvel at the fact that the guy played on all of one Springsteen recording and it turned out to be ‘Born to Run.’ Then stand back and prepare for that first crash of sound that hits you with reckless impact. Seemingly a thousand instruments coming at you at once, even though the album credits list a mere six players contributing to the track.

    "Now, listen, really listen to that opening riff again. Listen to how it seems to bust down walls, break invisible chains, clear your sinuses, and promise nothing short of infinity. And, hey, keep in mind that Steve Van Zandt, fittingly, made an unsung contribution to the track by altering Springsteen’s initial riff simply because he misheard it. Bruce liked the riff the way Steve heard it better, and that became the riff etched in the annals of rock history. Who knows what might have happened if he hadn’t happened along in the studio that day, but that’s part of Steve’s indefinable genius, isn’t it?

    "OK, now the lyrics begin, and you need to hear how Bruce nails the existence of an entire generation in two electric lines: ‘In the day we sweat it out on the street of a runaway American dream/At night we ride through mansions of glory in suicide machines.’ Do you notice how his description of these folks is peppered with such explosively active phrases? ‘Sprung from cages on Highway 9/Chrome-wheel fuel-injected and stepping out over the line.’ There is so much motion and potency in these words, a dead-on depiction of frustrated youth afraid to stand still because they might never be able to start again.

    "At this point, take into account how Bruce’s narrator has an ulterior motive with all of this fancy talk: He’s trying to convince his girl, Wendy, to join him on an escape from ‘this town,’ which he describes as if it were a living entity, a remorseless Terminator programmed to grind down hope and promise. As David Sancious’ piano swirls all around him, Bruce gets to the point of his argument: ‘We got to get out while we’re young/’Cause tramps like us, baby, we were born to run.’

    "A couple things you need to consider at this point. First of all, what a pinpoint choice of words when he calls himself and those like him ‘tramps.’ He could have said ‘bums like us,’ but ‘tramps’ has just the right tinge of romance clinging to it, more apt to the ebullient music. Next, think about how endlessly profound the phrase ‘Born to Run’ is. Born to run from their problems. Born to run because it’s in their nature, an instinct no different than a shark’s single-minded quest to eat. Born to run because inertia is tantamount to death. Born to run with all of the grace and beauty of a gazelle, and born to run in a desperate, messy gait to escape the hellhounds of the past.

    "As the next verse begins, it’s time for you to hone in on Garry Tallent’s burbling bass underpinning the entire grandiose structure of the song. But try also to notice how Bruce balances a genuinely heartfelt and chaste promise to Wendy with some bawdy talk to appeal to her more prurient side: ‘Wendy, let me in, I want to be your friend, I want to guard your dreams and visions/Just wrap your legs round these velvet rims and strap your hands across my engines.’ But for all of that bravado, this guy quickly reveals himself to be vulnerable: ‘I’m just a scared and lonely rider’ who wants to know ‘if love is real.’ The multi-faceted nature of this character is part of what makes this song so enduring.

    "OK, time for Clarence. Just sit there with your jaw open at his lightning quick solo. Ain’t nobody running anywhere faster than that. But prepare for a change of pace, because now the bridge arrives, and the music has an almost dreamlike quality. All the better to accompany Springsteen’s description of the nightlife. He highlights its allure, from the picturesque scenery to the sounds of the traffic to the boys and girls.[...]

    "You can also appreciate, especially in this period in which we live when irony rules and all genuine gestures are vied suspiciously, the unabashedly romantic nature of the line that ends this section: ‘I want to die with you, Wendy, on the streets tonight in an everlasting kiss.’ With that, the reverie is shattered by a blistering drag race between Bruce on guitar and Clarence on sax, all leading to the drum-rolling, instruments-poised-to-strike crescendo.

    "I can’t begin to calculate the number of times that I’ve listened to ‘Born to Run,’ and, let me tell you, the moments following that crescendo give me chills every time. The main riff returns, this time embellished by all of the Spectorian grandeur surrounding it, and Bruce bursts out in a voice so cathartically desperate it practically cracks with the immortal couplet: ‘Highway’s jammed with broken heroes on a last-chance power drive/Everybody’s out on the run tonight but there’s no place left to hide.’

    "Consider now how those lines may have resonated with their creator, and how that desperation wasn’t a put-on. Springsteen was putting everything into this song, because it might very well have been his last chance. With two mediocre-selling albums in his rear-view that didn’t come close to matching the hype his record company heaped on him, had ‘Born to Run’ flopped, Bruce likely wouldn’t have been given another shot to go this big again. His career was at stake; talk about rising to the occasion.

    "It should all be gravy from here, but rest assured that Bruce isn’t going to mail it in. Because in the final lines, you realize that these two might never get out, grounding this song in a sorrow that runs counterpoint to the lofty optimism. It deepens the entire enterprise when the narrator qualifies his final promise to Wendy with ‘I don’t know when.’ But, then again, as we are reminded three times in increasingly impassioned refrains, ‘Tramps like us, baby, we were born to run.’

    "Now savor every second as the E Street Band, albeit one with a one-off lineup containing Sancious and Carter, brings it all home with gusto as Bruce gives his ‘Whoa-ohs’ every last ounce of energy he has. As the reverb of the final note dissipates, how do you feel? Exhilarated? Heartbroken? Blown away? Inspired? Spent? If you feel all of the above, then you’ve followed my instructions to the letter."

    She's the One – 3 stars
    This one, to me, is like "Night". Sorry to say, hearing about a femme fatale just isn't all that interesting to me. In my usual macabre way, you'd need to really make it twisted to grab my attention (Junichiro Tanizaki's short stories are a fantastic read).

    The lyrics are good, as per usual. But they're short and somewhat sparse and it never leaves the fact that it's just descriptions of this girl. She remains almost a caricature filling out the cliché femme fatale role.

    Musically (I could probably be crucified for this amongst Bruce fans), it doesn't interest me any more than "Night". There are live versions where Bruce attaches an intro titled "Mona" to the song. There, he plays in a loose, almost rambling fashion very similar to the style on The Wild, the Innocent, and the E Street Shuffle. Deadly quiet at time, stretching out, with long wails of almost incoherency at points and a drawl that is pure Bruce, it directly contrasts the very tight and on point arrangement and sound of the entirety of Born to Run. Jacking this 4 and a half minute song up to between 13 and 15 and a half minutes and merging these two very distinct (though classic) sounds of rock 'n' roll, I would have been a thousand times more interested in this musically.

    Again, it's not bad musically. But there isn't enough here in total (just as with "Night") to make me give this more than 3 stars (again, on a Born to Run scale). Even in terms of the album...it's a fun song, but what does this random femme fatale have to do with the concepts and motifs of the album thus far?

    Again, good song, even if not one of the best...but an oddball on the album.

    Meeting Across the River – 5 stars
    So short, it's more like a preface to "Jungleland" – but it's sure as Hell downright perfect, regardless. With a piano backdrop and a trumpet pushing pure, sad jazz (while in the midst of it all, a lone pass is heard strumming), it's a gorgeous track to lay the story of a guy trying to get his friend to give him a ride, so he can make good on a shady deal.

    There really isn't much else to say. If I say more, I reveal the story and that's something that you ought to just experience for yourself. We don't know what'll happen to these guys. Maybe they run afoul. Maybe not. But we wind up understanding and sympathizing with the trap they're encased in, hoping they succeed.

    Jungleland – 5 stars
    Alright – this – this is one of the best song ever made. And I don't mean it ranks in there, maybe with some songs better than it. No, no – I mean that this is what to aim for in a song. It ranks at the very top. Maybe there are others which tie with it. But that's it, they just tie. And for someone as indecisive as me, who would never dare to rank something solely the best because I couldn't say if something else is better (notice how I still admit others could tie) – that's saying something.

    Let's start with that undeniable beginning. Two notes from the violin and then the piano. Gracefully, the violin weaves beautiful musical strokes as the piano dances around it. Considering the subject matter, there are plenty of other instruments which might have been used. Yet that captures "Jungleland" so perfectly – look beyond the literal to what it means. It's newfound and dreams, the waking and birth of something just budding, just beginning.

    Then the lyrics enter:

     

    The rangers had a homecoming
         in Harlem late last night
    And the Magic Rat drove his sleek machine
         over the Jersey state line
    Barefoot girl sitting on the hood of a Dodge
         drinking warm beer in the soft summer rain
    The Rat pulls into town, rolls up his pants
    Together they take a stab at romance and disappear down Flamingo Lane

     

    The heroes have already been determined within the first lines. As the police have some sort of great bust in Harlem, the Magic Rat escapes and slides into New Jersey, completely decked in style. Stuck in a world of entrapment, he finds escape, independence, and self-sufficiency within crime. this is important, integral to the understanding of these characters.

    After the Magic Rat's been introduced, now so is the barefoot girl. She is possibility. That very line is everything as it should be: "Barefoot girl sitting on the hood of a Dodge drinking warm beer in the soft summer rain." Sure, it's male-centric and, really, semi-superficial. But it's that instinctual picture of desire and beauty – just a girl, barefoot, sitting on a car drinking a warm beer, something so natural and not dressed up and yet capable of moving you so slightly.

    Together, they take a chance, go out on that limb, and just see what the Hell might happen. Flamingo Lane is more than just a street – it's life and they're intent on living it.

     

    Well, the maximum lawman run down Flamingo
         chasing the Rat and the barefoot girl
    And the kids round here look just like shadows
         always quiet, holding hands
    From the churches to the jails
         tonight all is silence in the world
    As we take our stand
         down
            in
               Jungleland

     

    As the two enter Flamingo, we enter their world. It starts with the persecution, going to the support in the face of such odds, to then their representation. And yet, in their own way, they are taking their stand. Forced to forever hide in the backstreets, and run like the tramps they're made to be, in their own way, they present their own form of resistance. While it's never concretely stated the way they resist, it's notable that right at the moment "From the churches to the jails tonight all is silence in the world" is sung, the organ strikes up to join the piano. By the time "down...in...Jungleland" is finished, the music has turned into a roar with the guitar joining the fray.

     

    Well, the midnight gangs assembled
         and picked a rendezvous for the night
    They'll meet `neath that giant Exxon sign
         that brings this fair city light
    Man, there's an opera out on the turnpike
         There's a ballet being fought out in the alley
    Until the local cops, cherry top,
         rips this holy night
    The street's alive as secret debts are paid
         contacts made, they vanished unseen
    Kids flash guitars just like switch-blades
         hustling for the record machine
    The hungry and the hunted
         explode into rock 'n' roll bands
    That face off against each other out in the street
         down
            in
               Jungleland

     

    The description continues and the connection between art and their life is more firmly established. The city becomes alive as the mundane and violent are turned into operas and ballets. The battles out on the streets are then matched to the battles of the bands, wielding their instruments like weapons. This is fittingly finished with a guitar solo, speeding up, building even further until bubbling over into:

     

    In the parking lot the visionaries dress in the latest rage
    Inside the backstreet, girls are dancing to the records that the DJ plays
    Lonely-hearted lovers struggle in dark corners,
         desperate as the night moves on
    In just one look and whisper...they're gone

     

    And with that, everything dissipates with a long blast from Clarence Clemons's Sax. In a solo that so entirely captures the night, in a way that tinges on a cliché jazz melody that undeniably reminds you of a city night to an original, whole melody that so perfectly grasps the wasted emotions of desperation and a look for solace that it surprises you that this song can once again do something so damn right.

    As that goodness ends and the violin and piano creep to the forefront, the violin too fades so that we just have that lone piano. In slow, steady and blunt notes, it jarringly contrasts to the uproarious and defiant sound previously in the song. Riding with the piano notes, Bruce begins:

     

    Beneath...the city...two hearts beat
    So-ul engines running through a night so tender
    In a bedroom, locked,
         in whispers of soft
         refusal...and then
         ...surrender
    In the tunnels uptown...the Rat's own dream guns him down
    Shots echo down them hallways in the night
    No one watches an ambulance pulls away
         or as the girl shuts out the bedroom light...

    Outside the street's on fire in a real death waltz!
         between what's flesh and what's fantasy
    And the poets down here don't write nothin' at all
         they just stand back – and let it all be

    And in the quick of a knife!
         they reach for their moment and try to make an honest stand...
    But they wind up wounded...not even dead...
    Tonight
       in
          Jun-
             gle-
                land!

    And with that Bruce erupts with a wild cry, the articulation and voice of every character that just tried to get by, to live, to make something of that world they were born in; we hear "Go-Cart Mozart’s insane ramblings, the Ragamuffin Gunner’s jaded fatalism, Crazy Janey’s healing sweet nothings, Zero and Blind Terry’s ghostly laughter, Madame Marie’s foreboding warnings, Spanish Johnny’s tragically romantic serenade to Puerto Rican Jane."

    By the end of that, words cannot describe the experience, the perfect articulation of life itself. It doesn't matter you never knew these people. Humanity has been shown to you and you mourn their suffering, understand their joy, respect their defiance. Drained and left naked, you're rendered breathless. Every time, that's what I'm left as.

  • The screen door slams…
    Mary's dress sways…

    Like a vision she dances across the porch as the radio plays
    Roy Orbison singing for the lonely
    Hey, that's me – and I want you only
    Don't turn me home again –
    I just can't face myself alone again…
    Don't run back inside, darlin',
    You know just what I'm here for
    So you're scared
    And you're that maybe we ain't that young – anymore
    Show a little faith! – there's magic in the night…
    You ain't a beauty, but, hey, you're alright
    Oh, and that's alright with me…

    You can hide 'neath your covers and study your pain
    Make crosses from your lovers, throw roses in the rain
    Waist your summer prayin' in vain
    For a savior to rise from these streets
    Well, now, I'm no hero – that's understood
    All the redemption I can offer, girl, is beneath this dirty hood
    With a chance to make it good, somehow
    Hey – what else – can wedo now?
    Exceptroll down the window and let the wind blow back your hair…
    Well, the night's bustin' open
    These two lanes will take us aaa-nnnny-where
    We got one last chance to make it real
    To trade in these wings-on-some-wheels
    Climb in back
    Heaven's waiting down on the track…

    Oh, oh, come take my hand
    We're riding out tonight – to case the Promised Land
    Oh oh, oh
    Oh, Thunder Road!
    Oh, Thunder Road!
    Oh, Thunder Road!
    Lying out there, like a killer in the sun!
    Hell, I know it's late – we can make it if we run!
    Ooh…
    Oh oh, oh, oh Thunder Road
    Hang tight! Take hold!
    Thunder Road!

    Well, I got this guitar and I learned how to make it talk…
    Yeah, my car is out back, if you're ready to take
    That lo-ooo-ong walk
    From your front porch to my front seat
    The door's open – but the ride, it ain't free
    Now, I know you're lonely for words that I ain't spoken
    But tonight, we'll be free – all the promises will be broken
    There were ghosts in the eyes of all the boys you sent away
    They hunt this dusty beach road in the skeleton frames
    Of burnt out Chevrolets
    They scream your name at night in the street
    Your graduation gown lies in rags at their feet
    And in the lonely cool before dawn –
    You hear their engines roaring on
    But when you get to the porch, they're gone on the wind…
    So, Mary, climb in:

    It's a town full of losers
    We're pulling out of here to wiiiiiin

     

     

    I think I most definitely will need to do a Born to Run album review soon.