America

  • I've been hearing a lot lately that, apparently, a lot of people (I'm assuming this is referring to people in America) find the constitution outdated and the ideas of the founding fathers to be irrelevant or wrong (made by people who are talking about others than themselves, notably).

    I was pretty sure that just about everyone agreed that the concepts of freedom of religion, speech, press, and ability to assembly are inherent human rights, that all Men are created equal, and that a government should allow for representation of the people and that a government which has ceased to serve the people in a complete and utter way should be overthrown. Also, that there should remain a set of checks and balances in the government to avoid any idea or thought to not be questioned (an example being the three separate branches of government - executive, legislative, and judicial).

    For the more historically adept and who are familiar with the Federalist Papers, they believe that we are under a Representative Democracy (aka a Republic) because it allows representation for the people while enabling a voice for the minority voices in the greater society and avoids the mob mentality that would easily, and unrestrained, emerge under a Democracy.

     

     

    I mean, really, even if people have utterly different understandings of what the founding fathers stood for, I thought the one thing we all agreed on was that they, for the most part (like, really the most part), had the right idea. Right?

  • Random comment from http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/721294#mwpphu-container (for the record, I think changing our currency is a horrid idea, even though the graphic designer in me gets giddy at the idea of new designs and the ability to give other American figures such as other past Native American figures (Sacagawea or otherwise), Susan B. Anthony, and FDR a national position of representation - but that's a discussion for another day):

    "It would be such a disgrace to this country to remove the first president of the United Stated George Washington and put Obama on instead. Possibly the worse president this country has ever had and if he continues the way he is we wll be in a depression instead of recession if were not alreaddy there. He states that we are doing better, he better get out of the white house and instead of taking all those vacations start talking to the average american who is struggling to even feed their children. This is wrong."

    My response?

    The point of this is not some liberal vs. conservative bull. It's a simple...let's talk with our heads before our behinds.

    For those who read this, you may remember that, before Obama was elected, I said that I wasn't exactly enthusiastic about him as a candidate. I forget if I said much after he was elected but his often complete lack of doing anything for liberal issues (and his complete regressive acts on gay rights) made me absolutely infuriated. In fact, outside of health care and how he's been handling the economy, I have found little for which I've necessarily wanted to praise him. He'd get more of a neutral from me rather than a positive or negative.

    But to say he's the *worst* president we've ever had? Seriously?

    That's like idiots who say Bush was the most conservative president we've ever had. Let's not forget, before 9/11 struck, he was going to sign a revision to NAFTA with the president of Mexico so that labor (i.e. people) could traverse across borders without restraint. Hell, the War on Terror, while arguably socially conservative, is not, by any means, economically conservative. To say otherwise is just blatantly false.

    Do I think Obama should go on a dollar bill, so soon? No, I don't think he's earned it. I'm hoping that in the future he'll do so and I think he's just playing it politically safe for now (of course, if he loses reelection, that plan will have done him no good and look very poor in the histories of time). But at this current moment, no, of course I don't think he deserves to be on any currency.

    But there's a far cry from that and then claiming he's running our country into the ground. Don't be so sensationalist. He's done some good, he's done some bad. But let's make sure we know what we're talking about (remember when everyone was freaking out over Michelle Obama taking a supposed "vacation"?). When people claim that he is just utterly awful, one of the worst people and presidents ever, and all other forms of hyperbole, I literally want to just flat out laugh - but I can't forget that these people actually think they're being intelligent (of course, they're criticism is usually followed by some inane remark of racism or trying to turn our country to communism). Just...stop, breath, and then think. That's all I ask.

    The world does not exist in blacks and whites, people, it is many shades of gray.

     

    (btw, if you want to see the different designs, go here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/16/15-amazing-new-designs-fo_n_719913.html#s141225. Like I said, I don't want to change our currencies, but the new ideas and implementations are pretty cool)

  • I'm a Good Ol' Yankee
    Oh, I'm a good ol' Yankee; now that's just what I am
    And for the irons of slav'ry, I do not care to stand
    Threat against pride and living* has soaked our land in blood
    But hear that sor'id bondage? I regret not what I done...

    I loves this 'Mer'can nation, land of the free and brave
    I loves this Yankee nation, though it may bring my grave
    I loves the glor'ous Union, pray never may it part
    And, yes, I love ol' Dixie, so I swear upon my heart...

    I cried from news of Lincoln and cursed the traiter Booth
    I fought Bullrun with fervor as ardor passed with youth
    Can't regrow limbs from Gettys, though some be sure's yearning
    And I recall the rebel cries as Atlanta was set to burning

    Men sewed their clothes with cotton; 'tis dripping with slave blood
    For cents men crafted mountains, deep ridges in their "mud"
    And then men sat there wond'ring they chased the specter gourd
    Said too dumb to weild a gun - until we won the war

    I fought for the ol' Union, all 38 good states
    Now should I find her broken, I pray my soul too break
    United, not divided, I hope forever more
    And for this great Republic, I'll gladly see God's door

    Oh, I'm a good ol' Yankee; now that's just what I am
    And for the irons of slav'ry, I do not care to stand
    Threat against pride and living has soaked our land in blood
    But hear that sor'id bondage? I regret not what I done...

     

     

    *occupation

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    8-29-2010 to 8-30-2010 7:54 P. M.

  • I'm a few days late to commentary, ought to be asleep by now, and utterly unsure of what more I could honestly say that would sway anyone. It seems my emotional or angry posts come off more as serving for me to rant about an issue than make any further impact on anyone. So here's to ramming the head against the wall until it cracks (the head, that is to say).

    I don't think it would be news to anyone to hear that Proposition 8 has passed in the eyes of the court. Nearly all of those I'm subscribed to have written about it (which is why I love you all dearly).

    I could write about how it wasn't fair; I could write about how the tyranny of the majority was exactly what James Madison and Alexander Hamilton wanted to avoid when they suggested a Republic for our government; I could focus on many other things related Prop. 8, I'm sure. But I'm not going to.

    Rather, I'm going to get at the root of an issue we often dance around and offer poor answers to because, without an answer to this dilemma, we cannot properly look at these idea of justice and equality or our equality movements of the past the same way again.

    It is American culture to have a view of universal truths and equalities. Many of our campaigns and our ideals must have that idea intact. While we tolerate different ideas (you can be and identify with the KKK or Nazi party), we do put forth that certain ideas are correct or right. We do not necessarily give every idea equal "correct" status. Racism is wrong - that is a American ideal, despite whatever anyone else may say. Racism is not tolerated, and, despite its prevalence and the pervasive nature of it, you cannot hope to do much with a public attitude of racism, and we would consider it an injustice to stain our laws with it. Thus, we've made it future policy to keep it removed (first instances of "activist judges"). No judge today would approve it (certainly not without backlash).

    Most people would agree with the above.

    Then we get gay equality (some would probably ask I put equality in quotes here). Obviously, not all of us agree with it. And I know my gut reaction would have been, "To each their own." The fact still remains that, unless there is a foreseeable harm to other people, there should be no law restricting. Even if a certain group disagrees. That's how our laws have always worked (in an ideal sense). Skipping the full explanation of how such a stance changes nothing of the current environment, I'll jump to why we cannot hold that view ("to each their own") and hope to view equality and, further, our past in the same way that we do.

    We would like to say that simply you can disagree. Fact doesn't change that you disadvantage millions by keeping them as second class citizens. Granting rights that others enjoy to tax paying citizens is, technically, equality. But it loses the luster when we can't claim it as some universal right, doesn't it?

    However, the fact is, if we wanted to say that it's "up to you", the fights to end slavery and to segregate this nation become not a matter of right vs. wrong but simply that our ideal is to treat every citizen the same. Not because it is right but because for functionality (or maybe just 'cause, if you think the country could function with differing classes). The second you decide to say that something is not a matter of moral right or wrong, you can't give a speech on the "evils of segregation" because - hey, your belief in segregation is just as valid as my belief in integration. And as difficult as it would realistically be to keep public opinion as such, even if the whole of the public decides to integrate the U. S., we cannot say to those who want segregation that they are really wrong. If our ideal is still equal treatment of each citizen, then they are only wrong based on that ideal. Morally, they are not incorrect.

    Obviously, we as a people don't function like that. We (I'll be so brave as to say the majority) want to decry racism and sexism. We want to say it is wrong and we as a people won't stand for it. That was the point behind the Declaration of Human Rights - that it is universal and obvious that certain rights are just morally right and deserve to be given because to deny and to act as if any other idea on the matter is legitimate is wrong.

    But when it comes to sexualism, we become a little more divided. So I will argue that we cannot simply give it a "To each their own" and must come to an actual conclusion of the morality of homosexuality. Because if there is one thing the opposition can blather truthfully in the concoction of their other string of lies, it's that, if gays are accepted by the majority (which they will be because the fact becomes clearer and clearer with each new generation), there will be a confirmation of the "gay lifestyle" (please, please, please, please sense the sarcasm in that) by the majority. So we need to decide preemptively if that is a fine pursual.

    Understanding that this is a debate over whether gay people can be confirmed by our sense of a universal morality, I'm not going to address any religious texts, etc. While (being Christian) I would argue there is a means for biblical inclusion, that's not the concern here.

    It's a simple question: what does the presence of homosexuals, bisexuals, asexuals, transsexuals, intersexes, and the many other that fall under transgendered do to you?

    Assuming that morality is based upon the harm inflicted (as in the examples of murder, theft, lying, cheating, abusing, etc.) - how do the above people harm you?

    And I've heard the accusations - apparently we like to drink, do drugs, and have tons of sex. I've done none, by the way (other than the wine every Sunday). I've heard the argument that "it's a violent sin" (you know, us wanting to rape those angels and all). And yet our stereotype is...that we're weak and "pansies".

    And, of course, if you just let go of those stupid "it's a fad" ideas and that we're capable to "convert", you'd realize we've been here for years and some of us have been crucial to what you enjoy today.

    We aren't child molesters (I've had too many come out to me at 15 to believe that tripe and the out teachers at my school are some of the best role models I've ever had) and there are just as many of us molested as any straight person (I'll go on record and say I wasn't; there, theory foiled).

    And you ought to realize that we cannot alter sexuality (so stop guarding your kids like we'll snatch them; if they turn out gay, we didn't do anything to them, and you've just got to accept the fact). Believe me, there are some days I wish I could. I seem to have a disposition towards gay women, and it drives me insane. But that's the nature of sexuality. Whether you want to accept the fact or not.

    I could go into a diatribe about why would we want to go through half the crap we do when people are struggling with the idea of having to brace this world and society as a new sex (the bravery of the Trans community will never cease to amaze me) - but I won't.

    I think I've made my point. Tell me how holding my boyfriend's hand will destroy you suddenly. In a country that has allowed gay marriage for more than a year now, when will the sky fall in? Or, better yet, how about those other countries who have had it longer. But let's forget these fantastical consequences and focus on the real and personal - how will I hurt you (for I already know from experience I will not hurt myself)?

    How are homosexuals, bisexuals, asexuals, and transgendered hurting anyone?

  • America is not perfect - there is much we have screwed up on.

    That being said, this does not somehow restrict and constrain your ability to be patriotic. Just be aware of your own history. Truth isn't meant to blindingly hurt.

     

    That's all I'm saying. I'll get a headache if I submerge myself anymore in...[stopping now, stopping now]

     

     

    Our country - [...M]ay she always be in the right; but our country, right or wrong.
    -Stephan Decatur

  • What is a quote that you live by?

    You know, this is kinda perfect timing. I don't entirely live by it, but it's one of my favorite quotes from history (yes, I collect favorite quotes that people have said during historic situations): "Sir, I have not yet begun to fight!"

     

    From http://www.plunderbund.com/2006/02/17/i-have-not-yet-begun-to-fight/:
    On September 23, 1779, John Paul Jones was in a bloody battle for his life. His own ship The U.S.S. Bonhomme Richard was struggling with a 44 gun Royal Navy frigate known as “Serapis”. The battle was fierce and appeared over as Jones’ vessel was battle weary, burning, and sinking. In the midst of all this and as two of Jones’ cannons burst, the British commander yelled over to Jones and asked if he was ready to surrender. Conventional wisdom probably would agree that a surrender was in order. Jones eschewed such wisdom and instead yelled back, “Sir, I have not yet begun to fight”. 3 hours later the American crew boarded the Serapis and watched as the Bonhomme Richard sank into the sea.

    And this is what we traditionally refer to as badass and epic.

    I just answered this Featured Question; you can answer it too!

  • Well, this is about half a year after it happened to me, but "on time" was never something that ran in my family, it seems.

    In any case, towards the beginning of the year, there was held what was called a Screw Dance (why, I dunno) for all the Freshies. The entries all got together and people were randomly hooked up (you got to specify certain things, however, you'd want for a partner). Funnily enough, I was told it was casual dress and I had work beforehand. And, of course, some people had to dress up (ties and button-ups) and, of course, they had to be some of the first people I see. So I do a slight panic episode before the dance. You probably would've laughed.

    In the end, I decide to just forget about it and I probably won't see my partner for the night soon anyway, if things when utterly horribly.

    I forget the name of my date (I forget everyone's name, first time I meet them (and subsequent times afterwards...)). I do remember she was not from in-country because she kept refering to American customs the entire night. One of her complaints was our choice in dance music (they played mostly rap the entire night. There was a moment where they played Journey's Don't Stop Believing(let me tell you, watching everyone in that room kind of just stop and every single person in there sing the lyrics was one of the coolest things ever) but she didn't recognize the song).

    So, at one point, she notices the crucifix around my neck and remarks, "Are you Christian?" Then she sort of laughs and asks, "Are you a hard believing Christian or are you a 'Christian' - American Christian." Heh, I'm probably making (and will make) this girl sound so awful. She was very nice. Quite joking.

    However, the sentence did strike me. Granted, I know what she meant. We have many who are willing to claim being a Christian while not following any of the tenements and picking and choosing well away.

    However, countering that (and more to my annoyance), we have plenty of zealous, religious lunatics who do more than their fair share to twist not only logic but sanity and reason to a point that living loses all sense. But that's a divergence for another day...

    There are many things about the American people which piss me off to no extent. Which all the more angers me because I believe in and love America.  For all out faults, there is plenty when we got right.

    Yet, particularly in religion, we've got some screwed up habits (and people). To be honest, if it weren't for my crucifix, I don't think some would realize any religious dinomination about me - which is what I would want. Religion, in my mind, ought to be (for the most part) a very private thing. While countrary to "mainstream" Christianity, my actions ought to speak for my religion. But I see its function far differently from that of others.

    In any case, I hope my actions in the end say more of me than anything else. There's a reason I put a good deal of intent into them.

  •  

    I once stated on here that race relations in America were heading towards a train crash that most seemed to be conveniently oblivious to (with no further explanation of what I meant, of course). Well, maybe a train crash was a bit dramatic, but that they are confused and screwed up, I would certainly be willing to argue.

     

    The first thought you would probably have is that I’m talking about racism (and, if that is the case – in our American minds, white on black racism). However, I am not. Where to start?

     

    Simplistically, I am of darker skin. On a more complex level, I would be labeled half black and half white. Truly, I am multiracial. My mother was born and raised in Haiti. Her grandmother was from the lighter side of the country, her French heritage clear upon her. My grandfather was from the darker side, a mix of Haitian and Spaniard. My father is European, for the most part – his lines run from England to Poland to Scotland to Germany.

     

    But if you were to talk to anyone, they would generally call me black. I am reminded of the time in elementary school that my mother made a fuss over what race the school marked me down as; the secretary wanted to simply check African-American and be done with it; my mother insisted that’s not what I was.

     

    Yet in America, it doesn’t matter whether you’re really from Nigeria rather than born and bred here. No, it won’t always even matter if you happen to be Japanese instead. You’re not white – racism will follow you. In that sense, I am black. People will see me as that and I shall be treated accordingly. I have no qualms with this. I understand it and take it. My skin is dark.

     

    Even still, I have never understood most demonstrations and protests in justification of being black. I have studied and followed the history in America, yes – I know well slavery, done projects on it; one of my favorite time periods is the black civil rights movement; one of my favorite speeches is I Have a Dream. I’ve been subject to racism (though I doubt no one hasn’t been or isn’t well aware of it). Even before I faced it, a favorite movie in my household is Roots. I knew of racism since I was born.

     

    There was a problem, though. I’m middle class. The majority I’ve always known is white because that was what my classmates were for the most part. In fact, as I got older, the less racism I faced and the more my skin became an irrelevancy. I know better, so I’ve often wondered in awe how you could view someone who was different as the same as you so easily – my greatest acceptance (when it came to my skin) was from the majority. Other races for me were the many types of Asian. And while I have a deep love for rap, I’m a complete metal head, while my all time favorite artist happens to be Bruce Springsteen (taken from my dad, I admit). It was a white rapper who interested me in genre first, and Big Pun made me realize that my own windings among rhyme and alliteration were hardly anything in comparison. I consider myself a video game nerd. Some of my closest friends were the techies working backstage at the concerts (I have since become one since applying for a job in college, I am happy to report). My list of girlfriends has been Caucasian (if only for the reason I had little other choice, given my raising). And I have a fierce love for the gothic subculture; I remember listening to a spoken word poet listing the ways the majority stays complacent, shutting out the problems of the world; she lists the indignity of Columbine being placed on rap and video games; and then she cries, “Go back to your ‘goth’,” and I wanted to shout objection; did you forget they targeted us after Columbine just as much as the previous two?

     

    So am I any less black? Will I be viewed and judged differently? In the days leading up to the primaries for the Democratic Party, some of the “black leaders” said that Obama didn’t share with other blacks in America that history of slavery and was, therefore, different from them.

     

    One of my “brothers” happens to be a Jew. Of my “sisters”, one happens to be blue-eyed and the other a mixed Hispanic.

     

    I don’t know (nor understand) a “black” culture. I don’t understand what the green, black, and red colors of an African continent does for an American like myself, nor would I suppose it make much sense, if I considered my own heritage.

     

    So you’re probably thinking – are you criticizing black people? Is this some type of perverse racism and you feel the need to separate yourself from black people? Are you really this bored?

     

    America is characterized as a people of no color. In my mind, that has always meant that we were a people despite our differences. As I viewed the statue of Thomas Jefferson in Washington, I stood in the shadow of a man who shaped our nation – of which I was just as much a part of. This man may have not been Haitian, but he was certainly me. With every word of the Declaration of Independence, he was crafting my beliefs and my future.

     

    I may not have ancestors who suffered the pains of slavery in America, yet I view with pride the abolitionists who spoke out against it and the slaves who wove their own culture into the American fabric.

     

    I am a child of Western thought. The Greeks laid out the idea of a free government and the Romans crafted a form of what would be our own, someday. To those minds I owe and I make no mistake of it.

     

    I did not find alienation in the women’s civil rights movement and I use the words of Jane Addams and Sojourner Truth often enough.

     

    I wasn’t hosed down during the 60s, but it is one of my favorite times to study. It was those people who paved the way to the acceptance I receive today. It was a moment when we said, “We might have inherited many problems, but at no point can we not overcome them.”

     

    When I think of America, the words, “Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand/A mighty woman with a torch…/‘Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!’ cries she/With silent lips. ‘Give me your tired, your poor,/Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore./Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,/I lift my lamp beside the golden door!’” grace upon my lips, heaving with the spirit that must have infected the many who came to our land.

     

    The Grapes of Wrath, for me, didn’t describe a strange people or a landscape I didn’t know. I read with dislike the internment of Americans with Japanese ancestry. I rejoiced at the discovery of Stonewall. I sat with solemn acknowledgement at what the two Marches on Washington (1963 and 1979) meant for us as a nation.

     

    In short, every facet of American history defined me. We never got it right everytime – indeed, our grievances are many. But I take pride in what we have done. And I don’t understand why any person would isolate themselves to one position based on their heritage. Perhaps I’ve been too swayed by the words of King, but unification is the only route in my mind. I characterize myself as an American first and foremost.

     

    There is no “black” culture but only what of our culture was taken from people of color. I will identify myself as a German (among other things), I eat everyday now with chopsticks (something I always wanted to do since a kid), and I proclaim loudly, “In the future days which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and expression…. The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way…. The third is freedom from want…. The fourth is freedom from fear…”, “It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion…— and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth”, and “Yesterday the greatest question was decided which ever was debated in America; and a greater perhaps never was, nor will be, decided among men. A resolution was passed without one dissenting colony, ‘that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States.’”

     

    And, perhaps, most importantly, I believe deeply in that Latin saying – e pluribus unum.

     

    So what am I, America? Should I cling to an identity – whether that be black or Haitian or German or male – and define myself by it, letting no others share it?

     

    What am I, America? Should I find connection in only those like myself? Should I see my history only from those eyes?

     

    What am I, America?

     

    I thought I was American.